Tuesday, June 05, 2012

Akin Gump Employee -- Knowledge of a Crime

Nathalie Gilfoyle, JD
General Counsel
American Psychological Association
Washington, DC

Dear Ms. Gilfoyle:

Enclosed is my monthly felony fraud certification for June 2012.  There is circumstantial evidence that I am engaged in the commission of a felony against the government of the United States.  There is circumstantial evidence that I have used The George Washington University to help me defraud the government of the United States of hundreds of thousands of dollars in Social Security Disability benefits. 

I request that you counsel your colleague, Jesse Raben, Esq. to disclose to the FBI Washington Field Office the content of any communications he has ever had with attorney managers of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld concerning me.  Persons Mr. Raben may have communicated with include Malcolm Lassman, Esq. and Earl L. Segal, Esq.  You may contact the Washington Field Office of the FBI at 202 278-2000. 

Mr. Raben and I worked together at Akin Gump from June 13, 1988 to Spring 1990 where we had casual social contact.  See District of Columbia Brief on Appeal  Freedman v. D.C. Department of Human Rights, D.C.C.A. no. 96-CV-961 (Sept. 1, 1998) (
"According to Freedman, at a firm dinner in May 1989, another legal assistant [Jesse Raben] acknowledged hearing a rumor that Freedman was gay.  R. 329, 341.").  I worked at Akin Gump from March 1988 to October 1991.

Mr. Raben's knowledge of rumors about my sexual orientation, as found by the District of Columbia's Office of Corporation Counsel (see above), directly controverts the sworn statement of Dennis M. Race, Esq. and Laurence J. Hoffman, Esq. alleging that the subject of my sexual orientation was never raised by anyone involved directly or indirectly with my employment at the firm, and therefore is evidence that Mssrs. Hoffman and Race made a false sworn statement to a D.C. Government agency (the D.C. Office of Human Rights), a crime under the laws of the District of Columbia.

"B. Until the filing of this Charge, the subject of Claimant's sexual orientation was never brought up by Claimant or anyone involved directly or indirectly with Claimant's employment. While Claimant raised concerns about sexual and religious harassment, he never stated that it was based on his sexual orientation -- nor was it ever interpreted as such by anyone involved in this matter.

D. Claimant never complained of discrimination treatment based on sexual orientation.

Respondent contends that Claimant was terminated for good cause, nondiscriminatory reasons. Claimant's sexual orientation was not a factor or even known by those involved in any stage of the decision process. Respondent denies any violation of law."

Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apt. 136
Washington, DC  20008
202 362 7064

cc: FBI, U.S. Attorney (Darrell Valdez, Esq.)

1 comment:

Gary Freedman said...

An error in the original email was corrected in this blog post.