Monday, April 30, 2012

email Message to Senator Warren B. Rudman -- Akin Gump Fraud

Sen. Warren B. Rudman
Paul, Weiss

Dear Senator Rudman:

I may face federal criminal prosecution for defrauding the U.S. Social Security Administration in the amount of hundreds of thousands of dollars.  In the event the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia does file criminal charges I solicit your legal representation in this matter.

The following is an email message I sent to the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in early April 2012.  My case is somewhat unusual and complex. 

This email message is not confidential.  You may share it with others, including federal law enforcement, at your will.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Gary Freedman
3801
Connecticut Avenue, NW

Apt. 136

Washington, DC  20008

202 362 7064
______________________________







Criminal Division
U.S. Department of Justice

Dear Sir:

The following is my monthly criminal fraud certification per 18 U.S.C.§
4.  There is circumstantial evidence that I am currently engaged in the
commission of a felony against the Government of the United States.
There is circumstantial evidence that I have been engaged in a
long-term scheme to defraud the Government of the United States of up
to about $500,000 in public monies.

I am concerned that the Department of Justice will not
investigate this matter because a full investigation might embarrass
the law partners of Vernon R. Jordan, Jr., who happens to be a close
personal friend of Attorney General Holder.   Further, both the head of
the criminal division, Lanny Breuer, and the Attorney General, Eric
Holder, are former law partners of xxxxx, Esq. at the
law firm of Covington and Burling.  Mr. xxxxx is married to U.S.
District Court Judge xxxxx.  Also, Mr. Holder was a
colleague of Judge xxxxx's when both served as judges on the D.C.
Superior Court.  I believe that both Eric Holder and Judge xxxxx are
proteges of Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia's
representative in Congress.  As a concerned citizen I am specifically
concerned about the possibility of an obstruction of justice at the
highest levels of the U.S. Department of Justice.

I believe the following statement discharges my duty per 18 U.S.C. § 4
(misprision of felony) to report the commission of a felony perpetrated
against the Government of the United States.

I certify under penalty of criminal prosecution for making false
statements that the following declaration is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge:

1. The U.S. Department of the Treasury made a wire transfer of $1334 to
my bank account on April 3, 2012, per my claim of disability
granted by the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA): disability 
claim no. xxxxx.

2. The SSA determined that I became disabled and not suitable for
employment by reason of severe mental illness that may be associated
with a risk of violent behavior, effective October 29, 1991. As part of
my initial claim for benefits in 1993 I provided to SSA evidence that
my direct supervisor (Christine Robertson), who reported directly to a
senior management attorney (R. Bruce McLean, Esq.) at the law firm of
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld where I was employed, advised her
employees after my termination that she feared I might return to the
firm to kill her and arranged to have the firm take protective measures
to guard against a possible homicidal assault (agency record at 41).

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/06/social-security-notice-of-award-1993.html

3. The SSA determined that I became disabled effective October 29, 1991
based on the sworn declaration of Laurence J. Hoffman, Esq. and Dennis
M. Race, Esq. of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld,
where I was employed until I was diagnosed with mental illness that
might be associated with a risk of violence. Akin Gump's mental status
determination, according to the sworn declaration, was made in
consultation with a practicing psychiatrist (Gertrude R. Ticho, M.D.).
Dr. Ticho (deceased) denied in a letter written on her letterhead in
July 1993 and in a taped telephone conversation I had with her in
October 1993 that she ever had any communications of the kind alleged
by Akin Gump.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2009/12/social-security-administration-initial.html

4.  Comprehensive psychological testing performed by The George
Washington University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry and
Behavioral Sciences (Washington, DC) in May 1994 and in March 1996
failed to disclose that I suffer from any mental illness of any kind
and, further, failed to disclose the presence of any psychotic thought
processes.  In fact, I achieved a perfect score on the Wisconsin Card
Sorting Test in March 1996 -- a test of psychotic thinking -- which is
unusual  even in normal test subjects.  I was not on any medication at
the time of testing in 1994 or 1996.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/08/gw-psych-testing-concern-about-fraud.html

5. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed (1998) a prior
agency determination (1993) that found that Akin Gump's sworn
declaration was factual and that the employer's mental status
determination was genuine and credible, see Freedman v. D.C. Department
of Human Rights, D.C.C.A. no. 96-CV-961 (Sept. 1, 1998), relying in
part on the Brief on Appeal filed with the Court on July 25, 1997 by
the D.C. Corporation Counsel.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/12/dc-court-of-appeals-freedman-v-dc.html
 
6. On January 15, 2010 I was interviewed by Deputy Marshal 
xxxxx of the U.S. Marshals Service (Washington, DC) who had
concerns, based on my prior statements and conduct, that I might pose a
continuing and indefinite risk of harm to U.S. District Court Judge
xxxxx and the judge's immediate family. It was Judge
xxxxx who in 1996 affirmed a prior agency determination that failed
to find that Akin Gump's published statements that I might have been
homicidal and extremely dangerous, see paragraph 2 above (agency record
at 41), as of late October 1991 constituted acts of defamation
motivated by a discriminatory animus. Judge xxxxx relied in part on
inapposite case law to exonerate the apparent unlawful conduct of the
law partners of Vernon Jordan.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/04/superior-court-decision-freedman-v-dc.html

The USMS imposed continuing and indefinite protective measures limiting
my access to a public facility and to a house of worship. The
protective measures imposed by the USMS are inconsistent with my
employability under the Americans With Disabilities Act, which permits
an employer to refuse to employ a disabled person who poses a risk of
harm at a place of employment.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/12/fourth-amendment-touch-my-junk-please.html

7. I believe that to the extent that SSA claim no. xxxxx is based
on the sworn declaration of Laurence J. Hoffman, Esq. and Dennis M.
Race, Esq. that I became unemployable effective October 29, 1991, that
I suffered from severe mental illness and posed a risk of violence as
of said date, the claim is based on criminal fraud, a felony under
federal law.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/06/akin-gump-what-was-dc-corporation.html

8. I believe that to the extent that SSA claim no. xxxxx is based
on the aforementioned Brief on Appeal filed by the D.C. Corporation
Counsel with the D.C. Court of Appeals, the claim is based on criminal
fraud, a felony under federal law. I believe that the Brief on Appeal
contains several material omissions of fact and law calculated to
mislead the Court, misrepresents the agency record and findings, and
constitutes a willful fraud by the D.C. Corporation Counsel on the D.C.
Court of Appeals.

9. To the extent that Judge xxxxx exonerated the unethical conduct of
a psychiatrist in providing an ex parte professional opinion about my
mental health and stability to my former employer in violation of the
American Psychiatric Association's Goldwater Rule, which prohibits such
communications, Judge xxxxx exceeded her judicial power.  A
professional opinion offered by a psychiatrist about the mental health
and stability of an individual whom she has not seen in private
consultation does not meet the criteria established to ensure the
reliability of an expert psychiatric opinion and has no more clinical
value than a lay opinion and is therefore defamatory.  Further, Judge
xxxxx's action in exonerating the unethical conduct of a licensed
professional -- conduct that was, in fact, illegal per D.C. Code
§2-3305.14(26) as of the filing of the complaint in Freedman v. D.C.
Dept. Human Rights -- at the behest of her husband's law partner
(the late Charles F.C. Ruff, Esq., attorney for the defendant, Akin
Gump), carries the appearance of
impropriety.

10. I believe that to the extent that SSA claim no. xxxxx is
supported by the action of the USMS in concluding that I pose a
continuing and indefinite risk of harm to a federal judge (and that
judge's immediate family), and in imposing continuing and indefinite
restrictions on my access to a public facility and to a house of
worship, the claim is based on criminal fraud, a felony under federal
law. I believe that the USMS did not form a good faith belief that I
pose a risk of harm nor was the interview that Deputy Marshal 
xxxxx conducted at my residence on January 15, 2010, or my prior
conduct or statements that occasioned the interview, a sufficient basis
to conclude that I pose a risk of harm. Further, I believe that the
USMS interview was the product of a criminal conspiracy between the
USMS and other(s) to intimidate me in the free exercise of my
constitutionally-protected right to publish facts concerning the likely
fraudulent nature of my SSA disability claim and the likely criminal
conduct of attorney managers of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss,
Hauer & Feld. 18 U.S.C. Section 241 (Conspiracy against Rights).

11. USMS Associate General Counsel xxxxx (202-307-xxxx) advised me
by email on June 7, 2011 that a letter I sent to Judge xxxxx dated
August 14, 2000 -- 10 years ago -- triggered the USMS concerns that I
might pose a security risk to Judge xxxxx and prompted the USMS
interview on January 15, 2010. That proposition is so ludicrous that it
raises a substantial question about whether the stated reason for the
USMS interview was simply pretext for an attempt by the USMS to try to
intimidate me: a possible felony per 18 U.S.C. Section 241 (Conspiracy
against Rights.)

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/05/psychologist-nancy-shaffer-phd-dc-dept_5489.html

Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apartment 136
Washington, DC 20008





Albert H. Taub, M.D.


William D. Brown, Ph.D.


Letter to FBI -- 2/11/95

February 11, 1995
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
#136
Washington, DC  20008

David M. Bowie
Supervisory Special Agent
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington Field Office
Washington, DC  20535

RE:  Freedman v. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld

Dear Mr. Bowie:

I wish to inform the Federal Bureau of Investigation that I am currently receiving disability benefits from the U.S. Social Security Administration, that I will be filing for an extension of disability benefits in the upcoming months, and that my disability benefits claim is made in absolute good faith.

I forward for your information the following documentation regarding my disability claim:

1.  Letter dated February 10, 1995 to Philip C. Leadroot, U.S. Secret Service re: current status of determinations by various parties that I remain a serious threat to persons in my immediate environment and unemployable.

2.  Letter dated October 17, 1994 to Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney  for the District of Columbia re: apparent false sworn statements filed by attorney managers of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld concerning its disability determination.

3.  Tape recording comprising my conversations with:

(a.) Gertrude R. Ticho, M.D. on July 2, 1993 in which Dr. Ticho denies having communicated with any attorney managers of Akin Gump as found by the D.C. Department of Human Rights;

(b.)  Ilana Baptiste on July 2, 1993 in which Ilana Baptiste states her inability to substantiate finding by D.C. Department of Human Rights that an unnamed Sheppard Pratt Preferred Resources counselor communicated with attorney managers of Akin Gump;

(c.)  my sister, Mrs. Estelle Jacobson, on August 26, 1993 in which my sister registers her incredulity at diagnosis of bipolar disorder (manic depression) made by the George Washington University Medical Center.

As you know, based on documentation that I have previously forwarded to your office, Akin Gump was able to avoid the terms of its own disability insurance contract with UNUM Life by failing to advise me upon my job termination on October 29, 1991 that Akin Gump had determined that I suffered from a mental disability and that I was being terminated for that reason.  By the terms of the UNUM Life contract, a beneficiary is required to file a claim within 30 days of onset of disability.  I did not learn that Akin Gump had determined that I was disabled until December 22, 1992 upon my receipt of Akin Gump's Response to Interrogatories and Document Request filed with the D.C. Department of Human Rights, more than a year after the onset of disability, which according to Akin Gump was October 29, 1991.  Irrespective of my right under COBRA to retain disability insurance coverage, my right to file a claim with UNUM Life lapsed, by the express terms of the UNUM Life contract, as of November 29, 1991.

Akin Gump has, in effect, avoided increases in its insurance premium liability under a private disability insurance contract by deceptively withholding material facts from a beneficiary regarding the nature and onset of disability thereby preventing the beneficiary from filing a timely claim, resulting in the shifting of financial burden of benefits payments from a private insurer onto the U.S. Social Security Administration.

Sincerely,

Gary Freedman

What Did Eric Holder Know and When Did He Know It?

July 18, 1995
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
#136
Washington, DC  20008-4530

Mr. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
U.S. Attorney for the District
   of Columbia
Judiciary Center Building
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC  20001-2733

RE:  Freedman v. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld

Dear Mr. Holder:

The enclosed letter to the U.S. Secret Service, dated June 18, 1995, is forwarded for your information.

Sincerely,

Gary Freedman


Friday, April 27, 2012

Social Security Document Submission: 1993

December 6, 1993
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apt. 136
Washington, DC 20008

U.S. Social Security Administration
Office of Disability and International
       Operations
1500 Woodlawn Drive
Baltimore, MD 21241

RE: Disability Claim No. xxx-xx-xxxx

Dear Sir:

Enclosed with respect to the above-referenced disability claim is a copy of a collection of letters I have submitted to my current treating psychiatrist, Dr. Suzanne M. Pitts, during the period of my therapy with her. The letters cover a wide range of topics including interpretations of my dreams, thoughts about theoretical issues, and reflections on my mental state. It is hoped that review of this material by Social Security Administration mental health specialists will provide the agency with further insight regarding the nature of my disability, which, judging by the letters, is extraordinarily severe.

I feel that I have made no progress whatsoever in my therapy with Dr. Pitts. It might be useful if Social Security Administration specialists were to contact Dr. Pitts and offer her guidance on how best to proceed in my case. I have requested of two staff psychiatrists at George Washington University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Daniel Tsao and Dr. Caroline Wohlgemuth, that I be transferred to another psychiatrist.  My request was denied because, as stated by Drs. Tsao and Wohlgemuth, a transfer is not consistent with the Psychiatry Department's policy. A conference between a Social Security Administration psychiatrist and Dr. Jerry M. Wiener, Chairman of the Department of Psychiatry, might prove useful.

I would like to take this opportunity to advise the Social Security Administration that I continue to hold certain beliefs that might be termed paranoid.

I continue to believe that:

(a) Managers of my former employer, the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, continue to communicate regularly with psychiatrists at the George Washington University Department of Psychiatry regarding the status of my therapy. George Washington University Department of Psychiatry denies that such communications are taking place.

(b) Managers of my former employer continue to have regular and frequent communications with my sister, Mrs. Estelle Jacobson, to discuss the status of my therapy and other issues pertinent to my case. My sister denies ever having communicated with any Akin Gump managers.

(c) My friend Craig Dye has regular communications with Akin Gump managers.

(d) Librarians at the Cleveland Park Library branch of the D.C. Public Library System, which I visit daily, seem to be aware of the status of my therapy and other issues pertinent to my case on a day-to-day basis. I assume that an Akin Gump employee(s) communicates with one or more librarians at the Cleveland Park Branch daily. I have no objective basis to conclude that any library employees know my identity; however, I believe that I am hypersensitive to verbal and nonverbal clues, including double entendres voice inflection and intonation, and subtle mood shifts, which for me, have communicative value.
 
You may contact me at (202) 362-7064 or leave a message at (202) 363-3800.

Sincerely,

Gary Freedman

GW Psychiatric Treatment: Mental State 1995

The following is a brief humor piece I wrote in about 1995.  I was in psychiatric treatment at The George Washington University Medical Center at that time, where I was diagnosed with psychotic mental illness.  Psychotic mental patients generally lack a sense of humor.
___________________

Dear Stell,

dialogue for an upcoming episode:

Dennis Race: But he never said he was a homosexual!

Gertrude Ticho:  But I never spoke to a Dennis Rice!

Laurence Hoffman:  I just signed the damn thing--I didn't know what he put in there.

RSS:  Don't look at me, I was out of the country.

GW Psychiatric Treatment: Everything is Just One BIG Coincidence!!

I underwent a comprehensive battery of psychological testing at The George Washington University Department of Psychiatry in early May 1994.  The evaluator was an intern Yu-Ling Han working under the supervision of William Fabian, Ph.D.  The testing disclosed no psychotic thought processes, which I duly reported to the U.S. Social Security Administration.  Yu-Ling Han reviewed the results of the testing with me in late May 1994 in her office.  GW did not provide a copy of the test report to me until after the Medical Center terminated its relationship with me, effective June 30, 1996 -- approximately two years later, despite the fact that I had requested a copy of the test report continually during those two years.  Although the testing disclosed no psychotic thought processes and did not yield any psychiatric diagnosis, Dr. Fabian assigned the diagnosis Delusional (Paranoid) Disorder on the billing statement for the testing: a possible fraud on the Social Security Administration.

June 6, 1994
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
#136
Washington, DC  20008

Joseph R. Muffolett
Director
Office of Disability and
  International Operation
U.S. Social Security Administration
1500 Woodlawn Drive
Baltimore, MD  21241-0001

RE: Disability Claim No. xxx-xx-xxxx

Dear Mr. Muffolett:

This will advise, with respect to the above-referenced matter, that beginning the week of May 2, 1994 I underwent psychological/intelligence testing at the George Washington University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.  The testing was conducted by Ms. Yu-Ling Han  and comprised the following:

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale

Rorschach Projective Test

Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory

Thematic Apperception Test

Millon Self-Report Survey

Results of the testing, deemed valid by the evaluator, disclosed no psychotic thought processes and indicated no potential for violent behavior.  The test results, therefore, provide no independent confirmation of statements filed with the D.C. Department of Human Rights and Minority Business Development by my former employer, the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, relating to my mental health and purported violent propensities.

I continue to believe that I am under constant surveillance by my former employer, Akin Gump.  I believe that Akin Gump continues to have regular and frequent communications with the George Washington University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry and my sister, Mrs. Estelle Jacobson.  On the evening of May 4, 1994 I had a telephone conversation with my sister (tape recording enclosed herewith).  Certain of my sister’s comments seemed to allude symbolically to the psychological/intelligence testing that I was undergoing at GW at that very time.  I had not mentioned to my sister that I was undergoing such testing.  I interpreted certain of my sister’s comments as relating to the issue of personality profiling and other of her comments as relating to the Wechsler intelligence test.

The following is a transcript of the relevant portions of the subject telephone conversation.

Seeming allusions to personality profiling:

[Sister]: I got this astro[logy].  Now do you believe in astrology?  Like . . .

[Claimant]: Absolutely not.

[Sister]: Oh, you don’t.  Now when year read this stuff . . .  Well, I was reading this different stuff.  Well, you’re Capricorn, so is Suzanne.  Like I was reading mine.  Why don’t you believe in it?  Like what they say?

[Claimant]: Why would it be true?  That’s the question.

[Sister]: Why would it?  Yea.  I was reading a book why it’s true  I don’t know.  This is all different things.  “Basic characteristics.”  Now, do you have these characteristics?  Oh, let’s see.  You’re practical?  Persevering, cautious,  and economical.
   
[Claimant]: Hm-hm.

[Sister]:  Mm.  Many of you eventually become self-made people doing well in business, but not without some bitter lessons.  Oooh.  You can have a ruthless quality, never softened by mercy or the kindness of your preceding sign, Sagittarius.  Em. Haa.

[Claimant]: So, you’re describing one out of twelve people here.

[Sister]: [laughs]  Well, I’m describing Capricorn.  Yea.  Not to say.  No, but I mean, eh.  This, eh.  “When negative aspects.  You can be soured and embittered, discontented with your lot, but not consciously capable of taking any effort to improve it.  You could slip in and out of the sloth of depen[dency] despondency, which is one of your, the traps that Saturn lays on you.  Depression isn’t unusual all through your life, and you have to make a very determined effort to use the abuses of Saturn so that profitable lessons are learned from it.  Sometimes you’re introverted or self-centered, but this is a defense mechanism to protect your own interests.”  Ah, I find this stuff pretty interesting myself.

[Claimant]: Hm-mm.

[Sister]: But, eh.  I mean, I think there’s something to it.  Just seems that there is.  I don’t know.  Like that stuff you read in the paper, that’s kind . . .  I mean they’re so vague, they’re ridiculous.  But, you know.

[Claimant]: What?

[Sister]: You know, like when they have the horoscope in the paper?

[Claimant]: Yes.

[Sister]: Ya know.

[Claimant]: Yea.

_____________________________

Seeming allusion to the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale:

[Sister]: I have to get some pictures.  My next, that’s my next thing.  Like some botanicals.  You  know, those different pictures.  I think that’s what I want in the kitchen.

[Claimant]: Uh-huh.

[Sister]: And, yea.  I’m going’ up, eh.  Well, we had this Bat Mitzvah to go to--the Veksler’s daughter.  Our friends from down the shore?  Condo?  So, that's the 15th.  And Suz has been looking for a dress, without any success.  I’m gonna take her this weekend.

[Note sister’s remote associational linkage: “those different pictures”--”and, yea”--”Veksler’s.”  The association of "pictures” and “Veksler’s” is remote with respect to the manifest content only; when interpreted as symbolic references to the Wechsler test, sister’s seemingly remote associations fit neatly within the psychological testing context since portions of the Wechsler test employ pictures.]
__________________

Note the possible structural linkage between the two allusions.  First, with respect to the personality profiling, sister mentions her daughter, Suzanne:  "Well, you’re Capricorn, so is Suzanne.”  Second, with respect to the Veksler [Wechsler] allusion, sister mentions daughter, Suzanne, once again: “And Suz has been looking for a dress, without any success.”  In later part of conversation sister mentions that her daughter will be taking aptitude testing.

Sincerely,

Gary Freedman

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Akin Gump Fraud: Solicitation of Legal Representation

The following is the text of an email message I sent to Shanin Specter, Esq. of Kline & Specter.  Mr. Specter is the son of former Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter.


Shanin Specter, Esq.
Kline & Specter

Dear Mr. Specter:

I may face federal criminal prosecution for defrauding the U.S. Social Security Administration of hundreds of thousands of dollars.  In the event the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia does file criminal charges I solicit your legal representation in this matter.

The following is an email message I sent to the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in early April 2012.  My case is somewhat unusual and complex. 

This email message is not confidential.  You may share it with others, including federal law enforcement, at your will.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apt. 136
Washington, DC  20008
202 362 7064

________________________________________







Criminal Division
U.S. Department of Justice

Dear Sir:

The following is my monthly criminal fraud certification per 18 U.S.C.§
4.  There is circumstantial evidence that I am currently engaged in the
commission of a felony against the Government of the United States.
There is circumstantial evidence that I have been engaged in a
long-term scheme to defraud the Government of the United States of up
to about $500,000 in public monies.

I am concerned that the Department of Justice will not
investigate this matter because a full investigation might embarrass
the law partners of Vernon R. Jordan, Jr., who happens to be a close
personal friend of Attorney General Holder.   Further, both the head of
the criminal division, Lanny Breuer, and the Attorney General, Eric
Holder, are former law partners of xxxxx, Esq. at the
law firm of Covington and Burling.  Mr. xxxxx is married to U.S.
District Court Judge xxxxx.  Also, Mr. Holder was a
colleague of Judge xxxxx's when both served as judges on the D.C.
Superior Court.  I believe that both Eric Holder and Judge xxxxx are
proteges of Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia's
representative in Congress.  As a concerned citizen I am specifically
concerned about the possibility of an obstruction of justice at the
highest levels of the U.S. Department of Justice.

I believe the following statement discharges my duty per 18 U.S.C. § 4
(misprision of felony) to report the commission of a felony perpetrated
against the Government of the United States.

I certify under penalty of criminal prosecution for making false
statements that the following declaration is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge:

1. The U.S. Department of the Treasury made a wire transfer of $1334 to
my bank account on April 3, 2012, per my claim of disability
granted by the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA): disability 
claim no. xxxxx.

2. The SSA determined that I became disabled and not suitable for
employment by reason of severe mental illness that may be associated
with a risk of violent behavior, effective October 29, 1991. As part of
my initial claim for benefits in 1993 I provided to SSA evidence that
my direct supervisor (Christine Robertson), who reported directly to a
senior management attorney (R. Bruce McLean, Esq.) at the law firm of
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld where I was employed, advised her
employees after my termination that she feared I might return to the
firm to kill her and arranged to have the firm take protective measures
to guard against a possible homicidal assault (agency record at 41).

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/06/social-security-notice-of-award-1993.html

3. The SSA determined that I became disabled effective October 29, 1991
based on the sworn declaration of Laurence J. Hoffman, Esq. and Dennis
M. Race, Esq. of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld,
where I was employed until I was diagnosed with mental illness that
might be associated with a risk of violence. Akin Gump's mental status
determination, according to the sworn declaration, was made in
consultation with a practicing psychiatrist (Gertrude R. Ticho, M.D.).
Dr. Ticho (deceased) denied in a letter written on her letterhead in
July 1993 and in a taped telephone conversation I had with her in
October 1993 that she ever had any communications of the kind alleged
by Akin Gump.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2009/12/social-security-administration-initial.html

4.  Comprehensive psychological testing performed by The George
Washington University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry and
Behavioral Sciences (Washington, DC) in May 1994 and in March 1996
failed to disclose that I suffer from any mental illness of any kind
and, further, failed to disclose the presence of any psychotic thought
processes.  In fact, I achieved a perfect score on the Wisconsin Card
Sorting Test in March 1996 -- a test of psychotic thinking -- which is
unusual  even in normal test subjects.  I was not on any medication at
the time of testing in 1994 or 1996.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/08/gw-psych-testing-concern-about-fraud.html

5. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed (1998) a prior
agency determination (1993) that found that Akin Gump's sworn
declaration was factual and that the employer's mental status
determination was genuine and credible, see Freedman v. D.C. Department
of Human Rights, D.C.C.A. no. 96-CV-961 (Sept. 1, 1998), relying in
part on the Brief on appeal filed with the Court on July 25, 1997 by
the D.C. Corporation Counsel.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/12/dc-court-of-appeals-freedman-v-dc.html
 
6. On January 15, 2010 I was interviewed by Deputy Marshal xxxxx
 of the U.S. Marshals Service (Washington, DC) who had
concerns, based on my prior statements and conduct, that I might pose a
continuing and indefinite risk of harm to U.S. District Court Judge
xxxxx and the judge's immediate family. It was Judge
xxxxx who in 1996 affirmed a prior agency determination that failed
to find that Akin Gump's published statements that I might have been
homicidal and extremely dangerous, see paragraph 2 above (agency record
at 41), as of late October 1991 constituted acts of defamation
motivated by a discriminatory animus. Judge xxxxx relied in part on
inapposite case law to exonerate the apparent unlawful conduct of the
law partners of Vernon Jordan.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/04/superior-court-decision-freedman-v-dc.html

The USMS imposed continuing and indefinite protective measures limiting
my access to a public facility and to a house of worship. The
protective measures imposed by the USMS are inconsistent with my
employability under the Americans With Disabilities Act, which permits
an employer to refuse to employ a disabled person who poses a risk of
harm at a place of employment.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/12/fourth-amendment-touch-my-junk-please.html

7. I believe that to the extent that SSA claim no. xxxxx is based
on the sworn declaration of Laurence J. Hoffman, Esq. and Dennis M.
Race, Esq. that I became unemployable effective October 29, 1991, that
I suffered from severe mental illness and posed a risk of violence as
of said date, the claim is based on criminal fraud, a felony under
federal law.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/06/akin-gump-what-was-dc-corporation.html

8. I believe that to the extent that SSA claim no. xxxxx is based
on the aforementioned Brief on Appeal filed by the D.C. Corporation
Counsel with the D.C. Court of Appeals, the claim is based on criminal
fraud, a felony under federal law. I believe that the Brief on Appeal
contains several material omissions of fact and law calculated to
mislead the Court, misrepresents the agency record and findings, and
constitutes a willful fraud by the D.C. Corporation Counsel on the D.C.
Court of Appeals.

9. To the extent that Judge xxxxx exonerated the unethical conduct of
a psychiatrist in providing an ex parte professional opinion about my
mental health and stability to my former employer in violation of the
American Psychiatric Association's Goldwater Rule, which prohibits such
communications, Judge xxxxx exceeded her judicial power.  A
professional opinion offered by a psychiatrist about the mental health
and stability of an individual whom she has not seen in private
consultation does not meet the criteria established to ensure the
reliability of an expert psychiatric opinion and has no more clinical
value than a lay opinion and is therefore defamatory.  Further, Judge
xxxxx's action in exonerating the unethical conduct of a licensed
professional -- conduct that was, in fact, illegal per D.C. Code
§2-3305.14(26) as of the filing of the complaint in Freedman v. D.C.
Dept. Human Rights -- at the behest of her husband's law partner
(the late Charles F.C. Ruff, Esq., attorney for the defendant, Akin
Gump), carries the appearance of impropriety.

10. I believe that to the extent that SSA claim no. xxxxx is
supported by the action of the USMS in concluding that I pose a
continuing and indefinite risk of harm to a federal judge (and that
judge's immediate family), and in imposing continuing and indefinite
restrictions on my access to a public facility and to a house of
worship, the claim is based on criminal fraud, a felony under federal
law. I believe that the USMS did not form a good faith belief that I
pose a risk of harm nor was the interview that Deputy Marshal 
xxxxx conducted at my residence on January 15, 2010, or my prior
conduct or statements that occasioned the interview, a sufficient basis
to conclude that I pose a risk of harm. Further, I believe that the
USMS interview was the product of a criminal conspiracy between the
USMS and other(s) to intimidate me in the free exercise of my
constitutionally-protected right to publish facts concerning the likely
fraudulent nature of my SSA disability claim and the likely criminal
conduct of attorney managers of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss,
Hauer & Feld. 18 U.S.C. Section 241 (Conspiracy against Rights).

11. USMS Associate General Counsel xxxxx (202-307-xxxx) advised me
by email on June 7, 2011 that a letter I sent to Judge xxxxx dated
August 14, 2000 -- 10 years ago -- triggered the USMS concerns that I
might pose a security risk to Judge xxxxx and prompted the USMS
interview on January 15, 2010. That proposition is so ludicrous that it
raises a substantial question about whether the stated reason for the
USMS interview was simply pretext for an attempt by the USMS to try to
intimidate me: a possible felony per 18 U.S.C. Section 241 (Conspiracy
against Rights.)

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/05/psychologist-nancy-shaffer-phd-dc-dept_5489.html

Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apartment 136
Washington, DC 20008





cisionpoint? Never Heard of that Before!

Verizon Internet Services (71.163.72.58)
United States FlagWashington, District Of Columbia, United States    

  
26 Apr10:27:57 AM
  
(No referring link)
26 Apr11:00:03 AM

Paranoid Mental State: March 1994

March 15, 1994
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apt. 136
Washington, DC 20008

Joseph R. Muffolett
Director
Office of Disability and
      International Operations
U.S. Social Security Administration
1500 Woodlawn Drive
Baltimore, MD 21241-0001

RE: Disability Claim no. xxx-xx-xxxx

Dear Mr. Muffolett:

On Saturday March 12, 1994 I mailed a copy of the documentation I had previously sent to your office under cover dated March 10, 1994 (Statement in Lieu of Brief filed by the Government of the District of Columbia Office of Corporation Counsel) to the following authorities: the FBI, the U.S. Department of Justice (Civil Rights Division), and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. In all likelihood these agencies would have received my letter dated March 12, 1994 on Monday March 14, 1994. It is also plausible that representatives of these agencies contacted Mr. Dennis M Race of Akin Gump on Monday March 14, 1994 concerning my communication.

On Monday evening March 14, 1994 I placed a telephone call to my sister; enclosed is a tape recording of that telephone call. From a purely objective, non self-referential perspective one will observe the following peculiarities in my sister's comments.

1.  Many of my sister's comments repeat comments she made in the telephone call of April 26, 1993 (a transcript of which I forwarded to your office). These comments related to the Mt. Sinai book on nutrition, the issue of vitamins and vitamin A, and the discussion of various TV shows including Murphy Brown. It's almost as if my sister were engaging in a self conscious parody of the previous telephone conversation on April 26, 1993. It is curious (bordering on the uncanny) that of the approximately 40 telephone conversations I've had with sister since last April 26, 1993 it is on the evening of the day that the Justice Department and the FBI would have received my letter of complaint (i.e., March 14, 1994) that my sister seems to parody the one previous telephone conversation that seemed the most incriminating (i.e., the call of April 26, 1993). (Note that I did not provide my sister either the tape or transcript of the April 26, 1993 telephone conversation—although my former employer might have).

2.  When I ask my sister what happens to people who lie to the FBI, my sister yawns. You will note that in the transcript of the telephone conversation of October 16, 1992 I note that my sister yawns at the point very late in the conversation that I relate my (paranoid) belief that something incriminating had happened to my former supervisor that day. I noted also that I attributed that yawn to my sister's repressed rage; that psychoanalytic interpretation would also seem to apply to my sister's reaction on March 14, 1994 at the point I ask her about the FBI.

The following are a few subjective comments (ideas of reference) about the telephone conversation.

1.  I note my sister's extended comments about cooking a rice dish. I note the fact that in Dr. Gertrude Ticho's written denial of having communicated with Dennis Race she incorrectly spelled his name “Rice” instead of Race.

2.  I note that in my sister's comments about the movie Schindler's List that mys sister focuses on the angry reaction of the Nazi official, “When is all this going to end?” I infer that if Dennis Race received telephone inquiries from the Justice Department and/or the FBI on March 14, 1994, he way well have complained to his partners, “When is all this going to end?”

Of course I love my sister and do not want any harm to come to her. Couldn't the FBI offer my sister immunity in exchange for any information she might have relating to the actions of my former employer?

Something horribly wrong would have to be going on at Akin Gump for that organization to keep me under constant surveillance for the past 5½ years, assuming such surveillance is actually happening. The enclosed telephone directory will indicate to you just how insignificant I was in that organization.

Sincerely,

Gary Freedman

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Akin Gump Notes -- 6/13/95

RE:  Attached Letter concerning ability to appraise complex fact patterns
______________________

The enclosed letter of reference prepared by an attorney for whom I clerked in 1991-1982 states that I possess "a highly refined ability to analyze and research complex factual and legal issues and to thereafter reduce [my] findings to a clear and concise legal memoranda."

Presumably, according to the George Washington University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry, my mental condition and cognition have deteriorated dramatically since the attached letter was written: I now become easily confused and lost in a maze of facts.  At the present time I am, in GW's appraisal, "incapacitated" and able to perform only a few simple tasks--a psychological cripple.

It is doubtful whether a prosecutor could even overcome an insanity defense interposed on my behalf.

6/13/95

Akin Gump Notes -- 1995

The following are notes I wrote in about 1995:

1. Akin Gump managers are willing to perjure themselves to protect the firm's reputation

2.  Medical records indicate that I may be a liar.

3.  Mental health records indicate that I may be full of rage.

4.  Two employees report that I may have been planning to bring in a gun and commit a homicide.

5.  One partner is one of President Clinton's closest friends.

I may have lied 2/ about my violent intentions 3/ 4/ in regard to President Clinton, and Akin Gump may have withheld information regarding from [sic] the Secret Service 1/ 5/ in order to protect the firm's reputation.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Does George Stephanopoulos Know Who I Am?

conversation between Chinese Ambassador and Elizabeth Dole on Nov. 6, 1996: "I'm sorry to hear your husband lost his election."

EVENTS OF PREVIOUS DAY (1/31/96):

News report at 11:00 pm that White House attorney Mark Fabiani had been robbed at ATM machine.

News report about adapting ancient Hebrew to modern use -- NY times 1/31/96 -- "park and ride."  I know it's his car because I've seen him park here and get out of his car.

saw Stephanopoulos at DuPont circle on Sunday 1/21/96 drinking coffee -- turned away -- "He recognizes me."

D.C. Corporation Counsel: Letter Dated 1/27/96

January 27, 1996
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
#136
Washington, DC  20008-4530

William J. Earl, Esq.
Office of Corporation Counsel
Appellate Division
Room 6S-077
441 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC  20001

RE:  Freedman v. D.C. Dept. Human Rights
        D.C. Superior Court No. 0014 M.P.A.

Dear Mr. Earl:

I believe that in view of the unusual factual background of the above-referenced matter, as detailed in the enclosed letter dated September 26, 1994 to Charles L. Reischel, Esq. and letter dated June 8, 1995 to the Office of U.S. Attorney for D.C., it is appropriate that the D.C. Office of Corporation Counsel consider not defending this matter.

Sincerely,

Gary Freedman

Monday, April 23, 2012

GW Psychiatric Treatment: Memo dated 1/2/96

TO:       Dr. Georgopoulos
FROM: Gary Freedman
DATE:  January 2, 1996
RE:       Additions to Letter dated 12/27/95
____________________________________

The attached pages (pages 10-13) revise the previously submitted letter dated 12/27/95.

1.  Footnote 4 is new.

2.  A quote from Hesse's novel Demian was added to footnote 5 (at page 12)

3.  APPENDIX A discusses my fantasies in connection with infiltrating the FBI.

What Did Eric Holder Know and When Did He Know It?

January 2, 1996
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
#136
Washington, DC  20008-4530

Eric H. Holder, Jr.
U.S. Attorney for the District
   of Columbia
Judiciary Center Building
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC  20001-2733

RE:  Freedman v. D.C. Dept. Human Rights
       Social Security Disability Claim xxx-xx-xxxx

Dear Mr. Holder:

Enclosed for the information of the Office of U.S. Attorney is a copy of the most recent communication to my psychiatrist: memo dated January 2, 1996 (attaching revised version of letter dated December 27, 1995).

Sincerely,

Gary Freedman

Friday, April 20, 2012

Letter to U.S. Secret Service: 2/20/96

February 20, 1996
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
#136
Washington, DC  20008-4530

Philip C. Leadroot
Special Agent
U.S. Secret Service
Washington Field Office

Dear Mr. Leadroot:

The enclosed computer disc contains the text of a letter dated February 20, 1996 to the U.S. Secret Service.  The disc contains the texts of additional documents, previously submitted to the U.S. Secret Service, relating to the letter dated February 20, 1996.

Also enclosed are:

1.  Tape-recording of a telephone conversation with a former co-worker at Akin Gump, Mrs. Patricia A. McNeil.  The tape-recorded conversation includes statements relating to fears by employees at Akin Gump that I was potentially violent, and reports statements reportedly made by my former direct supervisor, Mrs. Christine Robertson, that I might be armed and homicidal.  Mrs. McNeil's statements as to her own beliefs and certain other employees are exculpatory as to my propensity for violence.

2.  Copy of City Paper article published in April 1993 re: civil rights problems at Akin Gump.  The article leads with an irrelevant reference to a close friend of President Clinton, Akin Gump partner Vernon Jordan.  The document is relevant to media handling of relatively insignificant civil rights issues at Akin Gump.

3.  Excerpt of newspaper article that appeared in the August 4, 1995 edition of The Washington Post (p. A1, p. A16) concerning a disbarment proceeding against a former Akin Gump attorney.  The article reports official determinations regarding Akin Gump's management style, which is termed inappropriately lax.

4.  Material relating to the professional background of Gertrude R. Ticho, M.D., the psychiatrist who, Akin Gump alleges, determined that I am paranoid and potentially violent.

Sincerely,

Gary Freedman

Thursday, April 19, 2012

GW Psychiatric Treatment: Letter dated February 12, 1996

TO:        Dr. Georgopoulos
FROM:  Gary Freedman
DATE:    February 12, 1996
RE:         GW University Liability for Actions Consistent with Akin Gump Risk Assessment and GW Medical Records
________________________

The following is the draft text of a letter to the University's Board of Trustees.  Purely from a psychological viewpoint you have to wonder what is the nature of other persons' reaction to me that would create a situation that would enable me to write a letter such as this.

* * * *

As a courtesy to the George Washington University I enclose a collection of documents that may be material to the University's defense of a possible future wrongful death or personal injury action brought against the University by my victim(s) or their survivor(s) should I commit an act of violence, including homicide or other heinous crime, consistent with the risk determination made by the Government of the District of Columbia or attorney managers and senior supervisors of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld.

The enclosed documents raise serious issues of legal liability for the University with respect to the standard of care of medical doctors enrolled in a residency program and the standard of care of board-certified staff psychiatrists in a supervisory capacity in the handling of a patient who has been determined by a government agency and a former employer to pose a significant risk of violence (including homicide).

Were I to commit an act of violence, including homicide or other heinous crime, consistent with the risk determinations of Laurence J. Hoffman, Esq., Dennis M. Race, Esq. and senior supervisors of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld; the Government of the District of Columbia or the most serious concerns of the U.S. Secret Service, one may rest assured that attorneys representing my victim(s) or their survivors(s) would scrutinize my medical records with great care to evaluate any deviations from an appropriate standard of care.

Make no mistake: if the facts of my case applied to one of the defendants in the Oklahoma City bombing matter, the resulting financial liability of the University to the victims and survivors would be catastrophic.

While I disavow an intent to commit an act of violence, my medical records expressly state that I may have lied on psychological testing administered in May 1994 in order to conceal the nature and severity of a paranoid (psychotic) mental disorder (which presumably places me at risk of committing an act of violence); that I do not appear to have a good psychological coping mechanism; and that further psychotic decompensation can be expected to occur at any time.

lied; coping; further decompensation

letter about biography US ATT
letter about surveillance DG
letter about IQ and  DOJ
2-7-96 SS no response and attach; letter SS 2-27-95
DOJ letter w/ footnotes

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Bob Strauss -- Narcissist?

Roadstar Internet (75.102.44.161)    0 returning visits
United States FlagThe Plains, Virginia   

  
18 Apr05:50:11 AM
  
18 Apr06:02:17 AM
  
18 Apr06:04:35 AM
  
18 Apr06:12:27 AM
  
18 Apr06:13:22 AM
  
18 Apr06:15:56 AM
  
18 Apr06:17:21 AM
  
18 Apr06:18:06 AM
  
18 Apr06:19:44 AM
  
18 Apr06:19:45 AM
  
18 Apr06:19:46 AM

U.S. District Court: Jury Duty Disqualification

January 29, 1996
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
#136
Washington, DC  20008-4530

Hon. John G. Penn
Chief Judge
U.S. District Court for the
    District of Columbia
3rd & Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC

RE:  Jury Duty Disqualification

Dear Judge Penn:

This letter will advise the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia of material facts that may disqualify me from any future service on a petit or grand jury impaneled by this Court.

1.  I continue to believe that I was subjected to job harassment and discrimination during my employment at the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld (Akin Gump).  According to the Government of the District of Columbia (Dept. of Human Rights), my belief that I was subjected to harassment and job discrimination while employed at Akin Gump was the product of a severe paranoid mental disturbance that renders me potentially violent and not suitable for employment, and, presumably, unable to distinguish reality from fantasy.

2.  Laurence J. Hoffman, Esq. and Dennis N. Race, Esq., two attorney managers of Akin Gump have, to the best of my knowledge, not disavowed a determination by my former direct supervisor, Christine Robertson, that I might be armed and homicidal.  According to the Government of the District of Columbia the act of Christine Robertson in advising her employees that I might be armed and extremely dangerous (homicidal) was not discriminatory in nature. 1/

The above factual determinations made by the Government of the District of Columbia are currently on appeal before the D.C. Superior Court in Freedman v. D.C. Department of Human Rights, No. 95 M.P.A. 0014.

Unless or until the above factual determinations are expunged, I may be permanently barred from jury duty by reason of severe mental impairment.

Sincerely,

Gary Freedman
____________________________
1/  But cf. McNeil v. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, No. 93-0477 (D.C.D.C., filed Nov. 29, 1993) (memorandum opinion and order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment).  The Hon. Joyce Hens Green therein found that Christine Robertson had exhibited racial animus toward minority employees under her supervision.  According to the Government of the District of Columbia my belief that I was subjected to harassment and discrimination by Christine Robertson was the product of a paranoid mental disturbance.

cc: Charles F.C. Ruff, D.C. Corporation Counsel
John C. Keeney, Acting U.S. Attorney General, Crim. Div.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney for D.C.

Letter to U.S. Secret Service: 1/22/96

January 22, 1996
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
#136
Washington, DC  20008-4530

Philip C. Leadroot
Special Agent
U.S. Secret Service
Washington, DC  20036

Dear Mr. Leadroot:

Enclosed is a copy of the most recent letter to my psychiatrist dated January 22, 1996.  The letter discusses my current mental state.

Sincerely,

Gary Freedman

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

A David Callet Recollection: Mind Like a Steel Trap!!

I worked as a paralegal at the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld from March 1988 till late October 1991.  From 1988 till 1990 I worked predominantly on a document production task for the client Eastern Airlines.

On the weekend of Saturday August 13 - Sunday August 14, 1988 I was requested to work overtime on a task in preparation for the so-called Eastern asset transfer litigation that was to commence on Monday August 15, 1988, which also happened to be the birth date of Vernon Jordan and Napoleon Bonaparte.  Fellow legal assistant Phil Feigen also worked that weekend.

I was assigned the task of digesting a lengthy deposition transcript.  On Saturday August 13 I telephoned the home of David Callet, one of the senior attorneys on the case, to ask what degree of depth he expected.  Mr. Callet wasn't home.  I spoke to Mr. Callet's wife Bette Callet who said, "David is at the office."  (I had first telephoned the home of Akin Gump partner Joel Cohn, but he wasn't home.)

I spoke by telephone with Mr. Callet about the deposition transcript.  He said to me: "The more information you can provide the more valuable the digest will be."

I worked nonstop till the beginning of the work day on Monday August 15.  J.D. Neary, the legal assistant coordinator, told me that I could go home and not return until Tuesday.  I left a note on the desk of Maggie Sinnott, the firm's legal assistant administrator that read: "I'll be taking the day off to celebrate Napoleon's birthday."

On Tuesday August 16, 1988 I had lunch with Craig Dye and Michael Wilson at a Thai restaurant on P Street.  After lunch I asked Craig and Michael if they wanted to stop up to my office to get a look.  They agreed.  As we were entering the Robert S. Strauss Building David Callet saw me entering the office with Michael Wilson and Craig Dye.  Mr. Callet turned to the person he was with and made a comment.  I assumed that Mr. Callet was surprised to see me with two cool dudes in view of my social isolation at the firm; but that is paranoid conjecture.

Craig admired the art work that decorated the hallways at the office.  I showed Craig and Michael my office on the fifth floor.   When they were about to leave, I said: "It's been great guys."  I had borrowed the phrase from the Eastern Airlines deposition witness whose transcript I had digested.  At the end of the deposition, the witness -- perhaps the accountant Farrell Coopersmith -- turned to the Akin Gump partner Joel Cohn and others present and said, "It's been great guys." 

Coopersmith had been hired by the Eastern Airlines pilots union to serve as a consultant.

Mind like a steel trap!!

Friday, April 13, 2012

An Interest in David Berkowitz?

Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker (209.255.210.222)    1 returning visit
United States FlagGainesville, Virginia, United States    

  
13 Apr03:25:58 PM
  
13 Apr03:29:44 PM
  
13 Apr03:32:06 PM
  
13 Apr03:47:35 PM
  
13 Apr03:47:40 PM
  
13 Apr03:52:29 PM
  
13 Apr03:52:39 PM
  
13 Apr03:52:46 PM
  
13 Apr03:53:29 PM
  
13 Apr03:54:30 PM
  
13 Apr03:54:38 PM
  
13 Apr03:54:47 PM
  
13 Apr03:55:25 PM
  
13 Apr03:55:36 PM
  
13 Apr03:55:46 PM