Tuesday, October 11, 2011

D.C. Superior Court Adverse Ruling -- Letter to Gertrude R. Ticho, M.D.

June 20, 1996
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
Washington, DC  200008-4530

Gertrude R. Ticho, M.D.
3120 Brandywine Street, NW
Washington, DC

Dear Dr. Ticho:

This will advise that the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxx, Judge) has affirmed that my former employer's concerns--as set forth in sworn statements made under penalty of criminal sanctions--relating to my mental stability and potential for violence were based on a professional opinion that you provided to attorney managers of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld.

You may at your discretion review this matter with Judge xxxxxxx (202 879 xxxx) or Chief Judge of the D.C. Superior Court, Eugene H. Hamilton (202 879 xxxx).

Based on our discussions I believe that the Court's decision is erroneous.  Your own failure to make a complete and public disavowal at the earliest possible time of false statements attributed to you could harm your reputation if this matter is reported in the press (which is not unlikely).


Gary Freedman


Gary Freedman said...

The tone of the letter following the Superior Court's adverse ruling is professional and business-like.

Where is the intense anger alleged by the U.S. Marshals Service?

Gary Freedman said...

I had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia 4 months earlier, in February 1996 by Dimitrios Georgopoulos, MD at GW.