The following webpage contains several disrespectful and offensive comments about a federal judge. These individuals should be investigated by the U.S. Marshal. The statements do not constitute protected speech under the First Amendment.
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/08/judge_rejects_citigroups_propo.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
For the record, I also oppose flag burning. I don't think it constitutes protected speech. I agree with Justice John Paul Stevens--a right-thinking judge.
As far as words go, I'm in Justice Hugo Black's court. No law means no law, as Justice Roberts recently said (my apologies to Justice Kagan).
This post is tongue-in-cheek, for those who have a problem with the English language.
Post a Comment