To the FBI Miami Field Office:
I have sent numerous email messages to Mark Eiglarsh, Esq., a Florida-licensed attorney, detailing evidence that I am currently engaged in a felony in violation of 42 USC 1011, a crime against the U.S. Government. Instead of making a criminal referral to federal law enforcement (apparently), Mr. Eiglarsh has requested that I stop sending him email messages. Is Mr. Eiglarsh's apparent inaction in the face of a felony admission appropriate conduct for an attorney, an officer of the court?
Gary Freedman
Washington, DC
I have sent numerous email messages to Mark Eiglarsh, Esq., a Florida-licensed attorney, detailing evidence that I am currently engaged in a felony in violation of 42 USC 1011, a crime against the U.S. Government. Instead of making a criminal referral to federal law enforcement (apparently), Mr. Eiglarsh has requested that I stop sending him email messages. Is Mr. Eiglarsh's apparent inaction in the face of a felony admission appropriate conduct for an attorney, an officer of the court?
Gary Freedman
Washington, DC
From: Mark Eiglarsh <mark@eiglarshlaw.com>
To: Gary Freedman <garfreed@aim.com>
Sent: Mon, Sep 9, 2013 4:41 pm
Subject: Re: So what's a federal judge supposed to do?
Would you kindly remove me from future emails?
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
Law Offices of
Mark Eiglarsh
4770 Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 610
Miami, FL 33137
Toll Free: 877-674-0003
Main Office: 305-674-0003
Fax: 305-674-0102
On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Gary Freedman <garfreed@aim.com> wrote:
From: David Schizer <dschiz@law.columbia.edu>
To: Gary Freedman <garfreed@aim.com>
Cc: jschiller <jschiller@bsfllp.com>; newyork <newyork@fbi.gov>
Sent: Sat, Sep 7, 2013 8:55 pm
Subject: Re: judicial conduct
To: Gary Freedman <garfreed@aim.com>
Cc: jschiller <jschiller@bsfllp.com>; newyork <newyork@fbi.gov>
Sent: Sat, Sep 7, 2013 8:55 pm
Subject: Re: judicial conduct
Dear Mr. Freedman,
I am not an expert on the rules you reference and am not in a position to advise you on this matter.
Best,
DS
__________________________
David M. Schizer
Dean and the Lucy G. Moses Professor of Law and
the Harvey R. Miller Professor of Law and Economics
Columbia Law School
212-854-2675
From: Gary Freedman <garfreed@aim.com>
To: dschiz@law.columbia.edu,
Cc: jschiller@bsfllp.com, newyork@fbi.gov
Date: 09/07/2013 03:34 PM
Subject: judicial conduct
Dean Shizer:
I pose a question of academic legal interest. It is well known that a judge must avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Just what constitutes propriety in a case where a federal judge receives a message such as the following?
Incidentally, Judge Roberts is a 1978 graduate of the Columbia University Law School.
Gary Freedman
Washington, DC
___________________________________
The Honorable Richard W. Roberts
Chief Judge
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Washington, DC
Judge Roberts:
The following message will serve as my misprision of felony certification for September 2013. I certify under penalty of perjury for making false statements that there is persuasive evidence that I am committing a felony against the Government of the United States. I certify that there is evidence that I am engaged in a long-term scheme to defraud the US Government of up to about $500,000 in public monies.
I commit myself to cooperating with the US Department of Justice in investigating this matter.
GARY FREEDMAN
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apartment 136
Washington, DC 20008\
202 362 7064
________________________________
Darrell Valdez, Esq.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, DC
Dear Mr. Valdez:
This email message (and its hyperlinks) will serve as my felony fraud certification for September 2013. It appears that I am continuing to commit a felony against the government of the United States by defrauding the U.S. Social Security Administration of up to about $500,000 in public monies in violation of 42 USC 1011. There is substantial evidence that I do not now nor have I ever suffered from an illness that would disqualify me from employment.
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2013/08/i-love-fact-that-simply-saying-i-am_17.html
I respect the determination of the Government of the District of Columbia, however, that as of October 1991 I suffered from a psychiatric disorder (consistent with schizophrenia) that rendered me a direct threat in the workplace, disqualifying me from the protections of The Americans With Disabilities Act -- an illness that, according to DC Government criteria, continues to the present.
The actual felony fraud certification, offered under penalty of prosecution for making false statements (under 42 USC 408), can be found at the following link:
https://www.change.org/petitions/to-the-director-of-the-federal-bureau-of-investigation-please-institute-a-criminal-investigation
I am available to assist the U.S. Department of Justice and The George Washington University Medical Center Medical Faculty Associates in any investigation of this matter.
Gary Freedman
Washington, DC
I am not an expert on the rules you reference and am not in a position to advise you on this matter.
Best,
DS
__________________________
David M. Schizer
Dean and the Lucy G. Moses Professor of Law and
the Harvey R. Miller Professor of Law and Economics
Columbia Law School
212-854-2675
From: Gary Freedman <garfreed@aim.com>
To: dschiz@law.columbia.edu,
Cc: jschiller@bsfllp.com, newyork@fbi.gov
Date: 09/07/2013 03:34 PM
Subject: judicial conduct
Dean Shizer:
I pose a question of academic legal interest. It is well known that a judge must avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Just what constitutes propriety in a case where a federal judge receives a message such as the following?
Incidentally, Judge Roberts is a 1978 graduate of the Columbia University Law School.
Gary Freedman
Washington, DC
___________________________________
The Honorable Richard W. Roberts
Chief Judge
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Washington, DC
Judge Roberts:
The following message will serve as my misprision of felony certification for September 2013. I certify under penalty of perjury for making false statements that there is persuasive evidence that I am committing a felony against the Government of the United States. I certify that there is evidence that I am engaged in a long-term scheme to defraud the US Government of up to about $500,000 in public monies.
I commit myself to cooperating with the US Department of Justice in investigating this matter.
GARY FREEDMAN
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apartment 136
Washington, DC 20008\
202 362 7064
________________________________
Darrell Valdez, Esq.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, DC
Dear Mr. Valdez:
This email message (and its hyperlinks) will serve as my felony fraud certification for September 2013. It appears that I am continuing to commit a felony against the government of the United States by defrauding the U.S. Social Security Administration of up to about $500,000 in public monies in violation of 42 USC 1011. There is substantial evidence that I do not now nor have I ever suffered from an illness that would disqualify me from employment.
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2013/08/i-love-fact-that-simply-saying-i-am_17.html
I respect the determination of the Government of the District of Columbia, however, that as of October 1991 I suffered from a psychiatric disorder (consistent with schizophrenia) that rendered me a direct threat in the workplace, disqualifying me from the protections of The Americans With Disabilities Act -- an illness that, according to DC Government criteria, continues to the present.
The actual felony fraud certification, offered under penalty of prosecution for making false statements (under 42 USC 408), can be found at the following link:
https://www.change.org/petitions/to-the-director-of-the-federal-bureau-of-investigation-please-institute-a-criminal-investigation
I am available to assist the U.S. Department of Justice and The George Washington University Medical Center Medical Faculty Associates in any investigation of this matter.
Gary Freedman
Washington, DC
7 comments:
Gary Freedman,
Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding Mark Eiglarsh, Esq. Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page.
Florida Office of the Attorney General
To the United States District Court
Southern District of Florida:
I have sent numerous email messages to Mark Eiglarsh, Esq., a Florida-licensed attorney, detailing evidence that I am currently engaged in a felony in violation of 42 USC 1011, a crime against the U.S. Government. Instead of making a criminal referral to federal law enforcement (apparently), Mr. Eiglarsh has requested that I stop sending him email messages. Is Mr. Eiglarsh's apparent inaction in the face of a felony admission appropriate conduct for an attorney, an officer of the court?
Gary Freedman
Washington, DC
To do list:
Send letter of complaint to the following--
Federico A. Moreno
Chief United States District Judge
305-523-5110
Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr.
United States Courthouse 400 North Miami Avenue 13-3 Miami FL 33128
Apparently, Drew Pinsky never told Mark Eiglarsh, "Don't antagonize a nut case!"
Mr. Eiglarsh, this has nothing to do with you. It has to do with creating "jurisdiction" -- and presenting information "in segments."
Study the Warsaw Ghetto. http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2009/10/dream-of-blue-oxford.html
--This means that they asked for very specific measures?
--Yes. Interchangeably. At a certain point the Bund leader, then at a certain point the Zionist leader--then what do they want? What message am I supposed to take? Then they gave me messages, various messages, to the Allied governments as such--I was to see as many government officials as I could, of course. Then to the Polish government, then to the President of the Polish republic, then to the international Jewish leaders. And to individual political leaders, leading intellectuals--approach as many people as possible. And then they gave me segments--to whom do I report what. So now, in these nightmarish meetings--two meetings--two meetings
FLORIDA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY:
Rule 4-8.3 REPORTING PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT
(a) Reporting misconduct of other lawyers: A lawyer having knowledge that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthyness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropriate professional authority.
(b) Reporting misconduct of judges: A lawyer having knowledge that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge's fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority.
Comment: Self regulation of the legal profession requires that members of the profession initiate disciplinary investigation when they know of a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. An apparently isolated violation may indicate a pattern of misconduct that only a disciplinary investigation can uncover.
This rule limits the reporting obligation to those offenses that a self regulating profession must vigorously endeavor to prevent. A measure of judgment is therefore required in complying with the provisions of this rule.
Post a Comment