Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Letter of Complaint Re: Mark Eiglarsh, Esq. to U.S. District Court


TO: The Honorable Federico A. Moreno
Chief United States District Judge
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse
400 North Miami Avenue
13-3
Miami FL 33128
___________________________________

To the FBI Miami Field Office:

I have sent numerous email messages to Mark Eiglarsh, Esq., a Florida-licensed attorney, detailing evidence that I am currently engaged in a felony in violation of 42 USC 1011, a crime against the U.S. Government.  Instead of making a criminal referral to federal law enforcement (apparently), Mr. Eiglarsh has requested that I stop sending him email messages.  Is Mr. Eiglarsh's apparent inaction in the face of a felony admission appropriate conduct for an attorney, an officer of the court?

At the very least Mr. Eiglarsh's behavior appears to violate Rule 4-8.3 REPORTING PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct.

Gary Freedman, Esq.
Washington, DC

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Eiglarsh <mark@eiglarshlaw.com>
To: Gary Freedman <garfreed@aim.com>
Sent: Mon, Sep 9, 2013 4:41 pm
Subject: Re: So what's a federal judge supposed to do?
Would you kindly remove me from future emails?

Sent from my iPhone 

Law Offices of
Mark Eiglarsh


4770 Biscayne Boulevard
Suite 610
Miami, FL 33137
Toll Free: 877-674-0003
Main Office: 305-674-0003
Fax: 305-674-0102



On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Gary Freedman <garfreed@aim.com> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: David Schizer <dschiz@law.columbia.edu>
To: Gary Freedman <garfreed@aim.com>
Cc: jschiller <jschiller@bsfllp.com>; newyork <newyork@fbi.gov>
Sent: Sat, Sep 7, 2013 8:55 pm
Subject: Re: judicial conduct
Dear Mr. Freedman,

I am not an expert on the rules you reference and am not in a position to advise you on this matter.

Best,

DS

__________________________
David M. Schizer
Dean and the Lucy G. Moses Professor of Law and
the Harvey R. Miller Professor of Law and Economics
Columbia Law School
212-854-2675



From:        Gary Freedman <garfreed@aim.com>
To:        dschiz@law.columbia.edu,
Cc:        jschiller@bsfllp.com, newyork@fbi.gov
Date:        09/07/2013 03:34 PM
Subject:        judicial conduct


Dean Shizer:

I pose a question of academic legal interest.  It is well known that a judge must avoid even the appearance of impropriety.  Just what constitutes propriety in a case where a federal judge receives a message such as the following?

Incidentally, Judge Roberts is a 1978 graduate of the Columbia University Law School.

Gary Freedman
Washington, DC
___________________________________

The Honorable Richard W. Roberts
Chief Judge
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Washington, DC

Judge Roberts:

The following message will serve as my misprision of felony certification for September 2013.  I certify under penalty of perjury for making false statements that there is persuasive evidence that I am committing a felony against the Government of the United States.  I certify that there is evidence that I am engaged in a long-term scheme to defraud the US Government of up to about $500,000 in public monies.

I commit myself to cooperating with the US Department of Justice in investigating this matter.

GARY FREEDMAN
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apartment 136
Washington, DC  20008\
202 362 7064
________________________________

Darrell Valdez, Esq.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, DC

Dear Mr. Valdez:

This email message (and its hyperlinks) will serve as my felony fraud certification for September 2013.  It appears that I am continuing to commit a felony against the government of the United States by defrauding the U.S. Social Security Administration of up to about $500,000 in public monies in violation of 42 USC 1011.  There is substantial evidence that I do not now nor have I ever suffered from an illness that would disqualify me from employment.

http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2013/08/i-love-fact-that-simply-saying-i-am_17.html

I respect the determination of the Government of the District of Columbia, however, that as of October 1991 I suffered from a psychiatric disorder (consistent with schizophrenia) that rendered me a direct threat in the workplace, disqualifying me from the protections of The Americans With Disabilities Act -- an illness that, according to DC Government criteria, continues to the present.

The actual felony fraud certification, offered under penalty of prosecution for making false statements (under 42 USC 408), can be found at the following link:

https://www.change.org/petitions/to-the-director-of-the-federal-bureau-of-investigation-please-institute-a-criminal-investigation

I am available to assist the U.S. Department of Justice and The George Washington University Medical Center Medical Faculty Associates in any investigation of this matter.

Gary Freedman
Washington, DC

1 comment:

Gary Freedman said...

Hell hath no fury like a crime victim scorned.

Mark, next time, show a little sympathy for a crime victim!