Sunday, October 31, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A blog devoted to the actors and public policy issues involved in the 1998 District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision in Freedman v. D.C. Department of Human Rights, an employment discrimination case.
3 comments:
For an employee to infer a sexual meaning from the phrase "Are you wet?" may credibly lead an employer to believe that the employee is mentally ill, potentially violent and not fit for employment (even in a case where the employer omits this probative evidence of the employee's lack of fitness for employment because to cite this evidence would establish that the employer was on notice that a supervisor was known to act inappropriately). See Freedman v. D.C. Dept. Human Rights, D.C.C.A. no. 96-CV-961 (Sept. 1, 1998).
"I needed to make Freedman look crazy, but not admit I knew that Robertson was a racist. Would you believe my first career choice was circus ring-leader? I'm actually very good at making elephants walk through hoops. Well, maybe not good enough." The Memoirs of an Akin Gump Partner
I'm looking forward to the direct deposit of my next check on 11/3/10.
A question for litigation support:
http://www.bnet.com/blog/businesstips/how-much-ram-do-you-really-need/5722
Like most guys, I need a lot.
"We have all seen many marvelous stunts in the circus but no performing elephant could turn a hand-spring without falling flat on his back."
--Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1944 Presidential Campaign
Post a Comment