Is it at all credible that the Director of the D.C. Department of Human Rights, Margie Utley, was oblivious to the inconsistencies in the depiction of the litigation support department at the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld -- as between Freedman v. Akin, Gump, Hauer & Feld and McNeil v. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld?
In Freedman the litigation support department was described as an average-expectable work environment. Following my complaint that the work environment in litigation support was unprofessional and distracting, I was described as being pathologically hypersensitive to goings-on in the department, mentally ill and unemployable. My allegation of anti-Semitism in the department was described as paranoid.
In McNeil the environment in the litigation support department was described as being at times disruptive and tinged with anti-Semitism. One employee (Isabell Schotz) who complained about the environment in litigation support was depicted as having reasonable and objective concerns.