Thursday, December 22, 2011

The $64,000 Question

Is it at all credible that the Director of the D.C. Department of Human Rights, Margie Utley, was oblivious to the inconsistencies in the depiction of the litigation support department at the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld -- as between Freedman v. Akin, Gump, Hauer & Feld and McNeil v. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld?


In Freedman the litigation support department was described as an average-expectable work environment. Following my complaint that the work environment in litigation support was unprofessional and distracting, I was described as being pathologically hypersensitive to goings-on in the department, mentally ill and unemployable. My allegation of anti-Semitism in the department was described as paranoid.

In McNeil the environment in the litigation support department was described as being at times disruptive and tinged with anti-Semitism. One employee (Isabell Schotz) who complained about the environment in litigation support was depicted as having reasonable and objective concerns.

2 comments:

Gary Freedman said...

Birds of a feather flock together!

Margie Utley: I wasn't aware of the contradictions.

Dennis Race: We didn't know.

A flock of ostriches!

malar said...






Hi, probably our entry may be off topic but anyways, I have been surfing around your blog and it looks very professional. It’s obvious you know your topic and you

appear fervent about it. I’m developing a fresh blog plus I’m struggling to make it look good, as well as offer the best quality content. I have learned much at your

web site and also I anticipate alot more articles and will be coming back soon. Thanks you.
















Litigation Support