Thursday, March 17, 2011

Akin Gump: "Because We Say So!"

"We conclude that appellants' work product claim, unsupported by any in camera identification or submission of the responsive documents in Akin Gump's possession, is simply too conclusory to meet their burden to show a "real, rather than speculative, concern" that the ordered production will reveal counsel's thought processes and strategies."

-- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

No comments: