Criminal Division
U.S. Department of Justice
Dear Sir:
I believe the following statement discharges my duty per 18 U.S.C. § 4 (misprision of felony) to report the commission of a felony perpetrated against the Government of the United States.
I certify under penalty of criminal prosecution for making false statements that the following declaration is true and correct to the best of my knowledge:
1. The U.S. Department of the Treasury made a wire transfer of $1288 to my bank account on July 1, 2011 per my claim of disability granted by the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA): disability claim no. xxx xx xxxx.
2. The SSA determined that I became disabled and not suitable for employment by reason of severe mental illness that may be associated with a risk of violent behavior, effective October 29, 1991. As part of my initial claim for benefits in 1993 I provided to SSA evidence that my direct supervisor (Christine Robertson), who reported directly to a senior management attorney (R. Bruce McLean, Esq.) at the law firm where I was employed, advised her employees after my termination that she feared I might return to the firm to kill her and arranged to have the firm take protective measures to guard against a possible homicidal assault (agency record at 41).
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/06/social-security-notice-of-award-1993.html
3. The SSA determined that I became disabled effective October 29, 1991 based on the sworn declaration of Laurence J. Hoffman, Esq. and Dennis M. Race, Esq. of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, where I was employed until I was diagnosed with mental illness that might be associated with a risk of violence. Akin Gump's mental status determination, according to the sworn declaration, was made in consultation with a practicing psychiatrist (Gertrude R. Ticho, M.D.). Dr. Ticho (deceased) denied in a letter written on her letterhead in July 1993 and in a taped telephone conversation I had with her in October 1993 that she ever had any communications of the kind alleged by Akin Gump.
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2009/12/social-security-administration-initial.html
4. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed (1998) a prior agency determination (1993) that found that Akin Gump's sworn declaration was factual and that the employer's mental status determination was genuine and credible, see Freedman v. D.C. Department of Human Rights, D.C.C.A. no. 96-CV-961 (Sept. 1, 1998), relying in part on the Brief on Appeal filed with the Court on July 25, 1997 by the D.C. Corporation Counsel.
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/03/dc-reply-brief-freedman-v-dc-dept-human.html
5. On January 15, 2010 I was interviewed by Deputy Marshal xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx of the U.S. Marshals Service (Washington, DC) who had concerns, based on my prior statements and conduct, that I might pose a continuing and indefinite risk of harm to U.S. District Court Judge xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxx and the judge's immediate family. It was Judge xxxxxxx who in 1996 affirmed a prior agency determination that failed to find that Akin Gump's published statements that I might have been homicidal and extremely dangerous, see paragraph 2 above (agency record at 41), as of late October 1991 constituted acts of defamation motivated by a discriminatory animus.
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/04/superior-court-decision-freedman-v-dc.html
The USMS imposed continuing and indefinite protective measures limiting my access to a public facility and to a house of worship. The protective measures imposed by the USMS are inconsistent with my employability under the Americans With Disabilities Act, which permits an employer to refuse to employ a disabled person who poses a risk of harm at a place of employment.
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/12/fourth-amendment-touch-my-junk-please.html
6. I believe that to the extent that SSA claim no. xxx xx xxxx is based on the sworn declaration of Laurence J. Hoffman, Esq. and Dennis M. Race, Esq. that I became unemployable effective October 29, 1991, that I suffered from severe mental illness and posed a risk of violence as of said date, the claim is based on criminal fraud, a felony under federal law.
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/06/akin-gump-what-was-dc-corporation.html
7. I believe that to the extent that SSA claim no. xxx xx xxxx is based on the aforementioned Brief on Appeal filed by the D.C. Corporation Counsel with the D.C. Court of Appeals, the claim is based on criminal fraud, a felony under federal law. I believe that the Brief on Appeal contains several material omissions of fact and law calculated to mislead the Court, misrepresents the agency record and findings, and constitutes a willful fraud by the D.C. Corporation Counsel on the D.C. Court of Appeals.
8. I believe that to the extent that SSA claim no. xxx xx xxxx is supported by the action of the USMS in concluding that I pose a continuing and indefinite risk of harm to a federal judge (and that judge's immediate family), and in imposing continuing and indefinite restrictions on my access to a public facility and to a house of worship, the claim is based on criminal fraud, a felony under federal law. I believe that the USMS did not form a good faith belief that I pose a risk of harm nor was the interview that Deputy Marshal xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx conducted at my residence on January 15, 2010, or my prior conduct or statements that occasioned the interview, a sufficient basis to conclude that I pose a risk of harm. Further, I believe that the USMS interview was the product of a criminal conspiracy between the USMS and other(s) to intimidate me in the free exercise of my constitutionally-protected right to publish facts concerning the likely fraudulent nature of my SSA disability claim and the likely criminal conduct of attorney managers of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld. 18 U.S.C. Section 241 (Conspiracy against Rights).
9. USMS Associate General Counsel xxx xxxxx (202-xxx xxxx) advised me by email on June 7, 2011 that a letter I sent to Judge xxxxxxx dated August 14, 2000 -- 10 years ago -- triggered the USMS concerns that I might pose a security risk to Judge xxxxxxx and prompted the USMS interview on January 15, 2010. That proposition is so ludicrous that it raises a substantial question about whether the stated reason for the USMS interview was simply pretext for an attempt by the USMS to try to intimidate me: a possible felony per 18 U.S.C. Section 241 (Conspiracy against Rights.)
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/05/psychologist-nancy-shaffer-phd-dc-dept_5489.html
Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apartment 136
Washington, DC 20008
Thursday, June 30, 2011
The Federal Crime of Misprision of Felony
The federal offense of failure to disclose a felony, if coupled with some act concealing the felony, such as suppression of evidence, harboring or protecting the person performing the felony, intimidation or harming a witness, or any other act designed to conceal from authorities the fact that a crime has been committed.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. Misprision of felony. Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
A federal judge, or any other government official, is required as part of the judge's mandatory administrative duties, to receive any offer of information of a federal crime. If that judge blocks such report, that block is a felony under related obstruction of justice statutes, and constitutes a serious offense.
Upon receiving such information, the judge is then required to make it known to a government law enforcement body that is not themselves involved in the federal crime.
The action of the U.S. Marshal Service on January 15, 2010 in intimidating me, a witness to felonies, from reporting evidence of said felonies on this blog, My Daily Struggles, may constitute the crime of Misprision of Felony.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. Misprision of felony. Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
A federal judge, or any other government official, is required as part of the judge's mandatory administrative duties, to receive any offer of information of a federal crime. If that judge blocks such report, that block is a felony under related obstruction of justice statutes, and constitutes a serious offense.
Upon receiving such information, the judge is then required to make it known to a government law enforcement body that is not themselves involved in the federal crime.
The action of the U.S. Marshal Service on January 15, 2010 in intimidating me, a witness to felonies, from reporting evidence of said felonies on this blog, My Daily Struggles, may constitute the crime of Misprision of Felony.
DC Rehabilitation Services Administration -- Job Search -- 2006
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
CLIENT SERVICES DIVISION
810 First Street N.E., 9th Floor
Washington, DC 20002-2247
Telephone: (202) 442-8400
CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY
03/07/2006
GARY FREEDMAN
3801 CONN. AVE., NW
Washington DC 20008
A preliminary assessment has been completed that included:
1) information that you, your family, other authorized representatives and advocates provided; and
2) information from existing records and other information.
Based on this assessment it has been determined that you have been found eligible for vocational rehabilitation services.
A. You have a physical or mental impairment
2) you can benefit in terms of an employment outcome and
B. You require vocational rehabilitation services to secure, prepare for, regain or retain a successful employment outcome.
Client Signature: /s/ Gary Freedman
Date of Client Signature: 3-7-06
Representative/Guardian Signature (when necessary):
Counselor Signature: Eugene Weatherford
Date: 3/6/06
Copy provided to client on (date):
Social Security Initial Claim -- Lack of Deception
May 20, 1993
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
#136
Washington, DC 20008
Fay E. Peterson
Disability Claims Examiner
District of Columbia
Rehabilitation Services Administration
Disability Determination Division
P.O. Box 37608
Washington, DC 20013
Disability Claim xxx-xx-xxxx
Dear Ms. Peterson:
Enclosed is a document material on the issue of what my former employer characterizes as my paranoid belief that I was a victim of harassment on the basis of perceived sexual orientation--a belief, which, in my former employer’s opinion, renders me potentially violent and presumably unemployable.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
#136
Washington, DC 20008
Fay E. Peterson
Disability Claims Examiner
District of Columbia
Rehabilitation Services Administration
Disability Determination Division
P.O. Box 37608
Washington, DC 20013
Disability Claim xxx-xx-xxxx
Dear Ms. Peterson:
Enclosed is a document material on the issue of what my former employer characterizes as my paranoid belief that I was a victim of harassment on the basis of perceived sexual orientation--a belief, which, in my former employer’s opinion, renders me potentially violent and presumably unemployable.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
Social Security Initial Claim -- Lack of Deception
June 15, 1993
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
#136
Washington, DC 20008
Paul G. Yessler, MD
2501 Calvert Street, NW
Suite 101
Washington, DC 20008
RE: Social Security Disability Psychiatric Evaluation xxx-xx-xxxx
Dear Dr. Yessler:
Enclosed is a copy of five pages of handwritten notes that I prepared in late October 1991 under the influence of my belief that the then manager of my apartment building, Ms. Elaine Wranik, inspected the apartment daily and reported her findings back to management of my former employer, Akin Gump. I left the notes in a prominent place in my Apartment to be reviewed by Ms. Wranik, in the period immediately prior to my job termination, on October 29, 1991.
I also left for Ms. Wranik the enclosed page from a text on shamanism. The comparison of my psychology with that of a “medicine man” is evidence of bizarre ideation.
Both the content of the writing and my motive in writing the document may evidence a grave personality disturbance not inconsistent with a diagnosis DSM-III 295.32 (Schizophrenia, stable paranoid type, chronic), which renders me unemployable. See, Spitzer, R.L., et al., DSM-III-R Case Book, at 28-30 (American Psychiatric Press: 1989) (discussing a patient suffering from a systematized delusion of a conspiracy of harassment).
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
The documents I submitted to Dr. Yessler were all prepared prior to my job termination at a time when I had no idea I would be terminated, and much less, terminated for mental health reasons that might qualify me for disability benefits.
Uncannily, the enclosed page from a text on shamanism was from a book edited by Gertrude R. Ticho, M.D. According to my former employer, the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, it was Dr. Ticho who advised the firm in late October 1991 that I appeared to have serious mental problems that might be associated with a risk of violence. I did not learn the identity of Akin Gump’s psychiatric consultant until I received the Initial Determination (dated June 30, 1993) from the D.C. Department of Human Rights that identified Dr. Ticho as Akin Gump’s psychiatric consultation. The text is The Psychoanalytic Study of Society, vol. 7, Edited by W. Muensterberger with A.H. Esman and . B. Boyer (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976), Gertrude R. Ticho, M.D., Washington, D.C., contributing editor.
The issue of Shamanism arises in my book, Significant Moments:
One of Freud's basic psychoanalytic strategies is to hide his face and act as a blank screen. This self-effacing performance encourages the patient to . . .
Ken Frieden, Freud's Dream of Interpretation.
. . . initiate and dominate the stage . . .
Rosemary H. Balsam, Neutrality and Loewald's Metaphor of Theater.
. . . to transfer his or her emotional attachments onto Freud in a first step toward working through childhood complexes.
Ken Frieden, Freud's Dream of Interpretation.
The analyst . . .
Rosemary H. Balsam, Neutrality and Loewald's Metaphor of Theater.
. . . sits quietly, . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy.
. . . watches the play, while being in his mind also a co-actor.
Rosemary H. Balsam, Neutrality and Loewald's Metaphor of Theater.
The analytic psychodrama leaves Freud's image an enigma, because within the walls of his office he surrenders his identity to the phantoms that haunt his patients . . .
Ken Frieden, Freud's Dream of Interpretation.
. . . continually . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy.
. . . attending to the form of the moment of communication while bearing in mind the whole session as it echoes and repeats the form of the patient's life drama—
Rosemary H. Balsam, Neutrality and Loewald's Metaphor of Theater.
Transference to a shaman is an ancient, worldwide technique of healing, widely studied by anthropologists and scholars of the history of religion. Shamanism preceded psychoanalysis and will survive it; it is the purest form of dynamic psychiatry.
Harold Bloom, The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages.
Freud might have founded psychoanalysis, but he did so, consciously or not, on much older foundations laid by practicing shamans throughout the world and over the millenia.
Michael Ripinsky-Naxon, The Nature of Shamanism.
We are concerned here, in particular, . . .
Richard Day and Ronald H. Davidson, Magic and Healing: An Ethnopsychoanalytic Examination.
. . . at this moment in our journey. . .
Radio Interview of President William Jefferson Clinton by CBS News (December 11, 1999).
. . .with the individuals . . .
Richard Day and Ronald H. Davidson, Magic and Healing: An Ethnopsychoanalytic Examination.
. . . who have been . . .
K.R. Eissler, Talent and Genius.
. . . referred to as “lightening conductors of common anxiety”—medicine men, sorcerers, shamans—who articulate a personal reformulation through the role of healer and who seek, by the alleviation of group anxiety, their own sense of identity and security.
Richard Day and Ronald H. Davidson, Magic and Healing: An Ethnopsychoanalytic Examination.
To both . . .
Isaac Deutscher, Marc Chagall and the Jewish Imagination.
. . . the analyst and . . .
Leonard Shengold, Soul Murder (“Insight as Metaphor”).
. . . the Shaman . . .
Jack London, The Son of the Wolf.
. . . metaphor is essential.
Isaac Deutscher, Marc Chagall and the Jewish Imagination.
The shaman conveys metaphors addressed to the spirit world through drumming, chants, dance, myths, drama, or more appropriately, psychodrama . . .
Michael Ripinsky-Naxon, The Nature of Shamanism.
. . . and by means of this . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy.
. . . fills the void wrought in the texture of existence by the incomprehensible experience of suffering. He serves as the link . . .
Charles Ducey, The Life History and Creative Psychopathology of the Shaman.
. . . that connects mystery to mystery, the known with the unknown . . .
Leonard Shengold, Soul Murder.
. . . and straight away, that is to say, out of himself, . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morals.
. . . the shaman . . .
Jack London, The Law of Life.
. . . creates . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morals.
. . . a metaphorical bridge . . .
Leonard Shengold, Soul Murder.
. . . between the everyday human world and the realm of the ineffable, the unconscious, or, in his subjective belief, the supernatural, and like Persephone he inhabits both worlds. He must experience the alien within himself as a prerequisite for interpreting and conferring significance upon the suffering of those who consult him for help against illness or misfortune. The personal experience of the alien, which resembles a mental disorder, is a major source of the apparent effectiveness of his form of psychotherapy, as it encourages the development of a greater than normal psychological sensitivity for his ever-renewed attempts to heal himself and his culture mates.
Charles Ducey, The Life History and Creative Psychopathology of the Shaman.
To put it in a nutshell:
Pawel Dybel, The Dilemmas of Psychoanalytic Interpretation.
The shaman, . . .
Charles Ducey, The Life History and Creative Psychopathology of the Shaman.
. . . the man of magic . . .
Richard Day and Ronald H. Davidson, Magic and Healing: An Ethnopsychoanalytic Examination.
. . . so singularly capable of suffering, . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy.
. . . is ill for conventional reasons and in a conventional way; his conflicts are simply unusually intense; he is like everyone else, only more so.
George Devereux, Normal and Abnormal.
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
#136
Washington, DC 20008
Paul G. Yessler, MD
2501 Calvert Street, NW
Suite 101
Washington, DC 20008
RE: Social Security Disability Psychiatric Evaluation xxx-xx-xxxx
Dear Dr. Yessler:
Enclosed is a copy of five pages of handwritten notes that I prepared in late October 1991 under the influence of my belief that the then manager of my apartment building, Ms. Elaine Wranik, inspected the apartment daily and reported her findings back to management of my former employer, Akin Gump. I left the notes in a prominent place in my Apartment to be reviewed by Ms. Wranik, in the period immediately prior to my job termination, on October 29, 1991.
I also left for Ms. Wranik the enclosed page from a text on shamanism. The comparison of my psychology with that of a “medicine man” is evidence of bizarre ideation.
Both the content of the writing and my motive in writing the document may evidence a grave personality disturbance not inconsistent with a diagnosis DSM-III 295.32 (Schizophrenia, stable paranoid type, chronic), which renders me unemployable. See, Spitzer, R.L., et al., DSM-III-R Case Book, at 28-30 (American Psychiatric Press: 1989) (discussing a patient suffering from a systematized delusion of a conspiracy of harassment).
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
The documents I submitted to Dr. Yessler were all prepared prior to my job termination at a time when I had no idea I would be terminated, and much less, terminated for mental health reasons that might qualify me for disability benefits.
Uncannily, the enclosed page from a text on shamanism was from a book edited by Gertrude R. Ticho, M.D. According to my former employer, the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, it was Dr. Ticho who advised the firm in late October 1991 that I appeared to have serious mental problems that might be associated with a risk of violence. I did not learn the identity of Akin Gump’s psychiatric consultant until I received the Initial Determination (dated June 30, 1993) from the D.C. Department of Human Rights that identified Dr. Ticho as Akin Gump’s psychiatric consultation. The text is The Psychoanalytic Study of Society, vol. 7, Edited by W. Muensterberger with A.H. Esman and . B. Boyer (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976), Gertrude R. Ticho, M.D., Washington, D.C., contributing editor.
The issue of Shamanism arises in my book, Significant Moments:
One of Freud's basic psychoanalytic strategies is to hide his face and act as a blank screen. This self-effacing performance encourages the patient to . . .
Ken Frieden, Freud's Dream of Interpretation.
. . . initiate and dominate the stage . . .
Rosemary H. Balsam, Neutrality and Loewald's Metaphor of Theater.
. . . to transfer his or her emotional attachments onto Freud in a first step toward working through childhood complexes.
Ken Frieden, Freud's Dream of Interpretation.
The analyst . . .
Rosemary H. Balsam, Neutrality and Loewald's Metaphor of Theater.
. . . sits quietly, . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy.
. . . watches the play, while being in his mind also a co-actor.
Rosemary H. Balsam, Neutrality and Loewald's Metaphor of Theater.
The analytic psychodrama leaves Freud's image an enigma, because within the walls of his office he surrenders his identity to the phantoms that haunt his patients . . .
Ken Frieden, Freud's Dream of Interpretation.
. . . continually . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy.
. . . attending to the form of the moment of communication while bearing in mind the whole session as it echoes and repeats the form of the patient's life drama—
Rosemary H. Balsam, Neutrality and Loewald's Metaphor of Theater.
Transference to a shaman is an ancient, worldwide technique of healing, widely studied by anthropologists and scholars of the history of religion. Shamanism preceded psychoanalysis and will survive it; it is the purest form of dynamic psychiatry.
Harold Bloom, The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages.
Freud might have founded psychoanalysis, but he did so, consciously or not, on much older foundations laid by practicing shamans throughout the world and over the millenia.
Michael Ripinsky-Naxon, The Nature of Shamanism.
We are concerned here, in particular, . . .
Richard Day and Ronald H. Davidson, Magic and Healing: An Ethnopsychoanalytic Examination.
. . . at this moment in our journey. . .
Radio Interview of President William Jefferson Clinton by CBS News (December 11, 1999).
. . .with the individuals . . .
Richard Day and Ronald H. Davidson, Magic and Healing: An Ethnopsychoanalytic Examination.
. . . who have been . . .
K.R. Eissler, Talent and Genius.
. . . referred to as “lightening conductors of common anxiety”—medicine men, sorcerers, shamans—who articulate a personal reformulation through the role of healer and who seek, by the alleviation of group anxiety, their own sense of identity and security.
Richard Day and Ronald H. Davidson, Magic and Healing: An Ethnopsychoanalytic Examination.
To both . . .
Isaac Deutscher, Marc Chagall and the Jewish Imagination.
. . . the analyst and . . .
Leonard Shengold, Soul Murder (“Insight as Metaphor”).
. . . the Shaman . . .
Jack London, The Son of the Wolf.
. . . metaphor is essential.
Isaac Deutscher, Marc Chagall and the Jewish Imagination.
The shaman conveys metaphors addressed to the spirit world through drumming, chants, dance, myths, drama, or more appropriately, psychodrama . . .
Michael Ripinsky-Naxon, The Nature of Shamanism.
. . . and by means of this . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy.
. . . fills the void wrought in the texture of existence by the incomprehensible experience of suffering. He serves as the link . . .
Charles Ducey, The Life History and Creative Psychopathology of the Shaman.
. . . that connects mystery to mystery, the known with the unknown . . .
Leonard Shengold, Soul Murder.
. . . and straight away, that is to say, out of himself, . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morals.
. . . the shaman . . .
Jack London, The Law of Life.
. . . creates . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morals.
. . . a metaphorical bridge . . .
Leonard Shengold, Soul Murder.
. . . between the everyday human world and the realm of the ineffable, the unconscious, or, in his subjective belief, the supernatural, and like Persephone he inhabits both worlds. He must experience the alien within himself as a prerequisite for interpreting and conferring significance upon the suffering of those who consult him for help against illness or misfortune. The personal experience of the alien, which resembles a mental disorder, is a major source of the apparent effectiveness of his form of psychotherapy, as it encourages the development of a greater than normal psychological sensitivity for his ever-renewed attempts to heal himself and his culture mates.
Charles Ducey, The Life History and Creative Psychopathology of the Shaman.
To put it in a nutshell:
Pawel Dybel, The Dilemmas of Psychoanalytic Interpretation.
The shaman, . . .
Charles Ducey, The Life History and Creative Psychopathology of the Shaman.
. . . the man of magic . . .
Richard Day and Ronald H. Davidson, Magic and Healing: An Ethnopsychoanalytic Examination.
. . . so singularly capable of suffering, . . .
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy.
. . . is ill for conventional reasons and in a conventional way; his conflicts are simply unusually intense; he is like everyone else, only more so.
George Devereux, Normal and Abnormal.
Extended Unemployment Query -- 1992 -- Work Seeking Requirement
July 24, 1992
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apartment 136
Washington, DC 20008
Government of the District of Columbia
Department of Employment Services
Office of Unemployment Compensation
500 C Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001-2187
Dear Sir:
I am currently receiving extended unemployment benefits. As a recipient of extended benefits I am required to conduct a job search for each week of benefits claimed, and am required to submit to the local employment office the names of the employers’ representatives with whom I spoke on the telephone on the "Report of Work Seeking Activities.”
On several occasions the employers’ representatives with whom I spoke advised me that the employer was accepting resumes for the position in which I expressed an interest, but the employer’s representative refused to give me her name. She advised me to send the resume to “Director of Personnel.”
I would like to know how to complete the “Report of Work Seeking Activities” with regard to instances in which the employer’s representative refuses to divulge her name. Also, I would like to know whether I may instruct the employer's representative that she is required to provide me her name pursuant to the work seeking provisions of Title 46, Sec. 108 of the District of Columbia Code pertaining to extended unemployment benefits.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apartment 136
Washington, DC 20008
Government of the District of Columbia
Department of Employment Services
Office of Unemployment Compensation
500 C Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001-2187
Dear Sir:
I am currently receiving extended unemployment benefits. As a recipient of extended benefits I am required to conduct a job search for each week of benefits claimed, and am required to submit to the local employment office the names of the employers’ representatives with whom I spoke on the telephone on the "Report of Work Seeking Activities.”
On several occasions the employers’ representatives with whom I spoke advised me that the employer was accepting resumes for the position in which I expressed an interest, but the employer’s representative refused to give me her name. She advised me to send the resume to “Director of Personnel.”
I would like to know how to complete the “Report of Work Seeking Activities” with regard to instances in which the employer’s representative refuses to divulge her name. Also, I would like to know whether I may instruct the employer's representative that she is required to provide me her name pursuant to the work seeking provisions of Title 46, Sec. 108 of the District of Columbia Code pertaining to extended unemployment benefits.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
APA Ethics Complaint -- William D. Brown, Ph.D.
American Psychological Association
April 21, 1993
CONFIDENTIAL
Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
#136
Washington, D.C. 20008
Der Mr. Freedman:
This is to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of April 8, 1993 expressing your internet to file a complaint against Dr. William D. Brown of Washington, D.C. To proceed with this matter we must ask you for certain information and releases.
To register a formal complaint you will need to fill out the enclosed Ethics Complaint Form. Copies of the 1989 and 1992 ethical principles are enclosed for your information and to assist you in filling out the Complaint Form. Also enclosed is a copy of the APA Ethics Committee’s Rules and Procedures. Please read them carefully so that you will understand how the complaint process works.
Consistent with Part V, Section 3 of the Committee’s rules, to be considered complete, the complaint must be comprised of the completed APA Ethics Complaint Form; such releases as required by the Committee; the waiver of right to subpoena documents for the purposes of private civil litigation; and any request that the applicable time limit be waived. Part II. Section 5.3 of the Committee’s rules addresses the time limits for filing complaints. For the purposes of time limits, the complaint will be considered filed only after all required components have been received.
Once the completed complaint is received, it will be evaluated, consistent with Part V, Section 5 of the rules, by the Chair of the Ethics Committee and by me.
I will await your response.
Sincerely,
Betsy Ranslow, M.S.
Director of Investigations
Office of Ethics
BR: kmh
Enclosures
Complaint Form
1989 & 1992 Ethical Principles
1992 Rules and Procedures
Information for Persons Filing Complaints with the APA Ethics Office
750 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20002-4242
(202) 336-5500
COMPLAINANT SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET
To assist you in completing the Ethics Complaint Form, we are providing you with two versions of our Ethics Code: The “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct” is applicable for those alleged behaviors occurring on or after December 1, 1992. The “Ethical Principles of Psychologists” (amended June 2, 1989) is applicable to alleged behaviors occurring through November 30, 1992. Behaviors occurring more than 10 years before the filling of a complaint are not within the jurisdiction of the Ethics Committee. (See “Rules and Procedures”, Part II, Section 5.3.6)
April 21, 1993
CONFIDENTIAL
Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
#136
Washington, D.C. 20008
Der Mr. Freedman:
This is to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of April 8, 1993 expressing your internet to file a complaint against Dr. William D. Brown of Washington, D.C. To proceed with this matter we must ask you for certain information and releases.
To register a formal complaint you will need to fill out the enclosed Ethics Complaint Form. Copies of the 1989 and 1992 ethical principles are enclosed for your information and to assist you in filling out the Complaint Form. Also enclosed is a copy of the APA Ethics Committee’s Rules and Procedures. Please read them carefully so that you will understand how the complaint process works.
Consistent with Part V, Section 3 of the Committee’s rules, to be considered complete, the complaint must be comprised of the completed APA Ethics Complaint Form; such releases as required by the Committee; the waiver of right to subpoena documents for the purposes of private civil litigation; and any request that the applicable time limit be waived. Part II. Section 5.3 of the Committee’s rules addresses the time limits for filing complaints. For the purposes of time limits, the complaint will be considered filed only after all required components have been received.
Once the completed complaint is received, it will be evaluated, consistent with Part V, Section 5 of the rules, by the Chair of the Ethics Committee and by me.
I will await your response.
Sincerely,
Betsy Ranslow, M.S.
Director of Investigations
Office of Ethics
BR: kmh
Enclosures
Complaint Form
1989 & 1992 Ethical Principles
1992 Rules and Procedures
Information for Persons Filing Complaints with the APA Ethics Office
750 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20002-4242
(202) 336-5500
COMPLAINANT SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET
To assist you in completing the Ethics Complaint Form, we are providing you with two versions of our Ethics Code: The “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct” is applicable for those alleged behaviors occurring on or after December 1, 1992. The “Ethical Principles of Psychologists” (amended June 2, 1989) is applicable to alleged behaviors occurring through November 30, 1992. Behaviors occurring more than 10 years before the filling of a complaint are not within the jurisdiction of the Ethics Committee. (See “Rules and Procedures”, Part II, Section 5.3.6)
Social Security Initial Claim: Evidence of Motive
I sent the following brief letter to my sister some time in early 1993 about my plans to file a claim for disability benefits with the U.S. Social Security Administration. The letter makes clear that my intent was not to live on the dole, rather I was filing a claim as a litigation strategy. I had the unsubstantiated or paranoid belief that my sister faxed all my written communications back to my former employer, the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld. I naively believed that if Akin Gump learned that I was planning to file a claim for disability benefits the firm would feel compelled to reinstate my employment. I believed that Akin Gump's managers, as attorneys, would be aware of the serious criminal problems that would arise for the firm if I filed a claim for government benefits based on the firm's sworn declarations, which I believed were perjured. In late December 1992, I had received Akin Gump's response to my complaint filed by the firm with the D.C. Department of Human Rights.
The following letter further supports, circumstantially, that my aim in staying on SSA benefits for the last 20 years is also a litigation strategy aimed at keeping my dispute with Akin Gump alive for jurisdictional purposes.
Dear Stell,
What do you think of this idea?
I’ll go to the social Security Administration and file for social security disability benefits and state that my former employer determined on the basis of consultations with two mental health professionals, including a psychiatrist, that I am too disturbed to be employable.
The Social Security Administration will then contact the firm and want to know more about this. Then what will they do?
GF
The following letter further supports, circumstantially, that my aim in staying on SSA benefits for the last 20 years is also a litigation strategy aimed at keeping my dispute with Akin Gump alive for jurisdictional purposes.
Dear Stell,
What do you think of this idea?
I’ll go to the social Security Administration and file for social security disability benefits and state that my former employer determined on the basis of consultations with two mental health professionals, including a psychiatrist, that I am too disturbed to be employable.
The Social Security Administration will then contact the firm and want to know more about this. Then what will they do?
GF
Robert S. Strauss: Ambassador to Russia
It was by way of the following article published in the New York Times on June 5, 1991 that I learned about Robert Strauss's background as an FBI agent.
After he graduated from the University of Texas Law School in 1941, Robert S. Strauss took a job as an F.B.I. agent "watching out for Communists," as he puts it.
"I would catch a spy nearly every other day," he jokingly recalled today about his F.B.I. postings in Washington, Ohio, Iowa and Texas. "I would come home at night and my wife, Helen, would say, 'Did you catch any spies today, dear?' "
Half a century later, after many cycles of conflict and entente in the United States-Soviet relationship, Mr. Strauss may soon be selling the charms of capitalism and the American way to the Russians. 'The Ultimate Capitalist'
President Bush passed over the Sovietologists in the Foreign Service and tapped his old friend from Texas, Bob Strauss, to be the new Ambassador to Moscow. The surprise appointment of Mr. Strauss, a Washington lawyer and Democratic Party mandarin who is fluent in Texas barbershop humor but not Russian, will have to be confirmed by the Senate.
After he graduated from the University of Texas Law School in 1941, Robert S. Strauss took a job as an F.B.I. agent "watching out for Communists," as he puts it.
"I would catch a spy nearly every other day," he jokingly recalled today about his F.B.I. postings in Washington, Ohio, Iowa and Texas. "I would come home at night and my wife, Helen, would say, 'Did you catch any spies today, dear?' "
Half a century later, after many cycles of conflict and entente in the United States-Soviet relationship, Mr. Strauss may soon be selling the charms of capitalism and the American way to the Russians. 'The Ultimate Capitalist'
President Bush passed over the Sovietologists in the Foreign Service and tapped his old friend from Texas, Bob Strauss, to be the new Ambassador to Moscow. The surprise appointment of Mr. Strauss, a Washington lawyer and Democratic Party mandarin who is fluent in Texas barbershop humor but not Russian, will have to be confirmed by the Senate.
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Social Security Initial Claim -- Lack of Deception
June 4, 1993
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
Apt. 136
Washington, DC 20008
Paul G. Yessler, MD
2501 Calvert Street, NW
Suite 101
Washington, DC 20008
RE: Social Security Disability Psychiatric Evaluation
Dear Dr. Yessler:
This will confirm my appointment at 11:00 AM, Saturday, June 12, 1993 with regard to the above-referenced matter.
Enclosed is a document that I have recently submitted to my current treating psychiatrist, Dr. Suzanne M. Pitts at the George Washington University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry. The writing may assist you in your evaluation of my current mental state.
Also, Dr. Pitts has a copy of my autobiographical sketch and a collection of letters and other documents and tape recordings I have prepared during the period of my therapy with her. You may wish to contact Dr. Pitts to obtain copies of these communications, which, again, may assist you in your evaluation.
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
________________________
Letters submitted to Dr. Pitts include:
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/01/me-freud-and-soviet-ambassador.html
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/07/gw-psychotherapy-letter-to-suzanne.html
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
Apt. 136
Washington, DC 20008
Paul G. Yessler, MD
2501 Calvert Street, NW
Suite 101
Washington, DC 20008
RE: Social Security Disability Psychiatric Evaluation
Dear Dr. Yessler:
This will confirm my appointment at 11:00 AM, Saturday, June 12, 1993 with regard to the above-referenced matter.
Enclosed is a document that I have recently submitted to my current treating psychiatrist, Dr. Suzanne M. Pitts at the George Washington University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry. The writing may assist you in your evaluation of my current mental state.
Also, Dr. Pitts has a copy of my autobiographical sketch and a collection of letters and other documents and tape recordings I have prepared during the period of my therapy with her. You may wish to contact Dr. Pitts to obtain copies of these communications, which, again, may assist you in your evaluation.
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
________________________
Letters submitted to Dr. Pitts include:
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/01/me-freud-and-soviet-ambassador.html
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/07/gw-psychotherapy-letter-to-suzanne.html
Involvement with U.S. Secret Service -- Evidence of Motive
In October 1994 I sent a letter to the Washington Field Office of the FBI that contained references to protectees of the U.S. Secret Service (USSS). The FBI referred the matter to the USSS. I was summoned to the Washington Field Office of the USSS by Special Agent Philip Leadroot (retired) for an interview in mid-December 1994. Agent Leadroot had me sign a consent to release information form to be submitted to the George Washington University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry where I was an out-patient in treatment with Dimitrios Georgopoulos, M.D. GW had me fill out the following form. My statements are highlighted in yellow. My statements make it clear that my intention in getting involved with the U.S. Secret Service was to prompt an investigation of the circumstances of my job termination, since all my previous letters to the Justice Department and the FBI were ineffective in prompting an investigation.
My former employer had filed false sworn statements with the D.C. Government alleging that it had determined that I was potentially violent. I had used the employer's false sworn declarations to obtain disability benefits from the U.S. Social Security Administration. It was my good faith belief that violations of federal law had occurred and that the U.S. Department of Justice wrongly refused to investigate these violations.
My former employer had filed false sworn statements with the D.C. Government alleging that it had determined that I was potentially violent. I had used the employer's false sworn declarations to obtain disability benefits from the U.S. Social Security Administration. It was my good faith belief that violations of federal law had occurred and that the U.S. Department of Justice wrongly refused to investigate these violations.
The George Washington University
Washington, DC
Medical Center
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Consent For Release of Information
I, Gary Freedman, of 3801 Connecticut Ave NW #136 Washington, DC hereby authorize Georgopoulos/Sotsky both M.D. to send Medical Records* to Philip C. Leadroot of U.S. Secret Service for the purpose of Psychological Evaluation in connection with determination by Govt of District of Columbia that I am potentially violent.
I understand that I may inspect this material and that I may request a copy for which there will be no charge. This consent is subject to revocation by me in writing at any time.
I expressly understand and agree that no liability of any nature shall attach to the attending physician, clinician or employee in acting upon this authorization and request.
I further understand that this information cannot be redisclosed without my authorization, and that the law requires this notice:
The unauthorized disclosure of mental health information violates the provisions of the District of Columbia Mental Health Information Act of 1978. Disclosures may only be made pursuant to a valid authorization by the client or as provided in Titles III or IV of the Act. The Act provides for civil damages and criminal penalties for violations.
*Medical records includes any written charts, notes, correspondence, psychological or other test results or reports, test raw data or any other records of any kind in GW's possession
/s/ Gary Freedman
2/8/95
/s/ [illegible witness]
Copies of this consent form must be:
1) provided to the patient
2) included in the patient record
3) accompany disclosures
Division of Ambulatory Care
The H.B. Burns Memorial Building
2150 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
Telephone (202) 994-4078
Fax (202) 994-6377
FBI -- Letter -- 1995
U.S. Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Investigation
1900 Half Street
Washington, D.C. 20535
February 3, 1995
Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, Northwest
#136
Washington, D.C. 20008
Dear Mr. Freedman:
This letter will acknowledge receipt of several recent communications from you, namely; letters dated January 12, 1995, January 23, 1995 and January 26, 1995 respectively. For your information the Washington Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has thoroughly reviewed these communications and find that they contain no information of value in identifying violations of federal law over which the FBI has investigative jurisdiction. Based on this fact, the referenced letters are being returned to you.
Sincerely,
William C. Megary
Acting Assistant Director in Charge
By:
/s/
David M. Bowie
Supervisory Special Agent
Federal Bureau of Investigation
1900 Half Street
Washington, D.C. 20535
February 3, 1995
Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, Northwest
#136
Washington, D.C. 20008
Dear Mr. Freedman:
This letter will acknowledge receipt of several recent communications from you, namely; letters dated January 12, 1995, January 23, 1995 and January 26, 1995 respectively. For your information the Washington Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has thoroughly reviewed these communications and find that they contain no information of value in identifying violations of federal law over which the FBI has investigative jurisdiction. Based on this fact, the referenced letters are being returned to you.
Sincerely,
William C. Megary
Acting Assistant Director in Charge
By:
/s/
David M. Bowie
Supervisory Special Agent
Monday, June 27, 2011
D.C. Attorney General: Assistance with the Commission of a Felony
Irvin B. Nathan
Attorney General
District of Columbia
Dear Mr. Nathan:
I believe I am currently engaged in the commission of a felony. I believe I am in the long term process of defrauding the U.S. government of $500,000 (a half-million dollars). I believe I am using the D.C. Department of Mental Health to fabricate evidence for a fraudulent Social Security Disability claim.
I want to offer my sincere thanks to William J. Earl, Esq., assistant attorney general for the District of Columbia for helping me to commit a felony. Without Mr. Earl's dogged efforts to conceal the commission of crimes by the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld as well as to defraud the D.C. Superior Court in the year 1996 it is doubtful whether I could have ever brought off my felony successfully. My hat's off to Mr. Earl.
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/06/akin-gump-what-was-dc-corporation.html
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apartment 136
Washington, DC 20008
202 362 7064
Attorney General
District of Columbia
Dear Mr. Nathan:
I believe I am currently engaged in the commission of a felony. I believe I am in the long term process of defrauding the U.S. government of $500,000 (a half-million dollars). I believe I am using the D.C. Department of Mental Health to fabricate evidence for a fraudulent Social Security Disability claim.
I want to offer my sincere thanks to William J. Earl, Esq., assistant attorney general for the District of Columbia for helping me to commit a felony. Without Mr. Earl's dogged efforts to conceal the commission of crimes by the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld as well as to defraud the D.C. Superior Court in the year 1996 it is doubtful whether I could have ever brought off my felony successfully. My hat's off to Mr. Earl.
http://dailstrug.blogspot.com/2011/06/akin-gump-what-was-dc-corporation.html
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apartment 136
Washington, DC 20008
202 362 7064
Legal Representation Solicitation -- 1993 -- Alan Banov, Esq.
August 5, 1993
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
#136
Washington, DC 20008
Alan Banov, Esq.
1920 M Street, NW
Washington, DC
RE: Gary Freedman v. Akin, Gump, Hauer & Feld
Dear Mr. Banov:
I telephoned your office on Wednesday afternoon, August 4, 1993 to inquire about obtaining legal representation in the above-referenced matter.
My employment was terminated on October 29, 1991 by the law firm of Akin Gump three working days after I complained to members of management that I was being harassed. On February 4, 1992 I filed a Complaint with the D.C. Department of Human Rights (DOHR), which Complaint is pending. On June 30, 1993 DOHR issued a no probable cause determination, which I have appealed with the enclosed pleading.
I have obtained incontrovertible, documentary evidence (appended to the enclosed pleading) that the termination was pretextual in that it was based on evidence fabricated by my former employer that I suffered from a serious mental disorder. The termination violated both the D.C. Human Rights Act of 1977, as amended, as well as the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. Also, my former employer’s action in fabricating evidence that I was paranoid and potentially violent is defamatory. A coworker, unlawfully terminated on April 9, 1992, has filed an action against Akin Gump in federal court under Title VII (a copy of that employee’s Complaint is enclosed).
You may reach me at (202) 362-7064 or leave a message at (202) 363-3800.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
#136
Washington, DC 20008
Alan Banov, Esq.
1920 M Street, NW
Washington, DC
RE: Gary Freedman v. Akin, Gump, Hauer & Feld
Dear Mr. Banov:
I telephoned your office on Wednesday afternoon, August 4, 1993 to inquire about obtaining legal representation in the above-referenced matter.
My employment was terminated on October 29, 1991 by the law firm of Akin Gump three working days after I complained to members of management that I was being harassed. On February 4, 1992 I filed a Complaint with the D.C. Department of Human Rights (DOHR), which Complaint is pending. On June 30, 1993 DOHR issued a no probable cause determination, which I have appealed with the enclosed pleading.
I have obtained incontrovertible, documentary evidence (appended to the enclosed pleading) that the termination was pretextual in that it was based on evidence fabricated by my former employer that I suffered from a serious mental disorder. The termination violated both the D.C. Human Rights Act of 1977, as amended, as well as the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. Also, my former employer’s action in fabricating evidence that I was paranoid and potentially violent is defamatory. A coworker, unlawfully terminated on April 9, 1992, has filed an action against Akin Gump in federal court under Title VII (a copy of that employee’s Complaint is enclosed).
You may reach me at (202) 362-7064 or leave a message at (202) 363-3800.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
Letter from Prof. Noam Chomsky -- MIT
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
20D-219
Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
February 11, 1997
Dear Mr. Freedman,
Just writing to acknowledge receipt of your letter and the disk. Will try to get to it, but given the massive overload, afraid I can't promise anything.
Sincerely,
/s/
Noam Chomsky
The Mah Nishtanah of Gary Freedman: Why Is Gary Freedman Different from All Other People?
schizoids.infoSchizoid Personality Test
Self-Assessment Questionnaire
By Mikel Martinez
Mark with a circle T (True) F (False)
1- I usually have someone to go out with .........T F
2 –I feel that life is pointless................. T F
3 –I usually work alone…… T F
4 - Sometimes I tell friends what a great time I had T F
5 –I have a poor sex life ............................T F
6 - Some people think that I am weird............................ T F
7- When people laugh or cry, I remain calm.................... T F
8 –Wherever I am, I’m always deep in thought............. T F
9- I am indifferent to praise...... T F
10- I am never affectionate................T F
11 – I don’t fit into a team.......................T F
12 – I usually enjoy life........................ T F
13 – I find it hard to congratulate people on their birthdays or other special occasions..... T F
14 - If someone snubs me, I tend to ignore it.......T F
15- If someone oversteps my boundaries, I know how to defend myself.... T F
16 – I have little success with the opposite sex.........T F
17 –I enjoy neighbourhood gatherings ..................T F
17 –I enjoy neighbourhood gatherings ..................T F
18 – I would prefer to lose than to struggle ....... T F
19 –I am fairly to very introverted .................. T F
20 – I am not interested in friendships............... T F
21-I laugh and smile readily .......... T F
22 – I am sometimes very effusive......... T F
23 –I always attend funerals of people I knew......T F
24- I feel very attached to certain people ...........T F
25 - I know how my friends live, but they do not know how I live T F
26- I devote myself to things I can do alone, rather than working in a group.. T F
27 – I have fewer friends than I have fingers on one hand.... T F
28-I feel disinclined to do my tasks ............ T F
29- I am easily bored by conversation ...... T F
30- I have no desire to be involved with anyone or anything .... T F
31- I find it hard to maintain eye contact ........ T F
32-Everything I do requires effort ........ T F
33-I am full of energy ..............T F
34-I prefer to go unnoticed ...... T F
35- I am unaffected by either good or bad news .......T F
36- Sometimes I feel apathetic .....T F
Give yourself one point for each of the following: 1F-2T-3T-4F-5T-6T-7T-8T-9T-10T-11T-12F-13T-14T- 15F-16T-17F-18T-19T-20T-21T-22F-23F-24F-25T-26T-27T-28T-29T-30T-31T-32T-33F-34T-35T-36T
RESULTS =If your total is 21-24 you can consider yourself a LOW schizoid
= If your total is 27-30 you can consider yourself an INTERMEDIATE schizoid
= If your total is 33-36 you can consider yourself a HIGH schizoid
DIAGNOSIS:This diagnosis is merely a guide, and is intended for personal use only. It is not meant to replace the professional evaluation of a psychologist or psychiatrist. .
(This web page is available.........in Spanish ........in French )
(This web page is available.........in Spanish ........in French )
Site updated on March 19 , 2011 . Cpyright (c) 2008-2011 schizoids.info
Saturday, June 25, 2011
Behold the Sun!
Seht die Sonne!
Farbenfroh am Himmelssaum,
östlich grüßt ihr Morgentraum!
Lächelnd kommt sie aufgestiegen
Aus den Fluten der Nacht,
Läßt von lichter Stirne fliegen
Strahlenlockenpracht !
Significant Moments: One Great Moment
I dashed to the library at the first opportunity.
Primo Levi, The Periodic Table.
Once there, . . .
Booker T. Washington, Up Front Slavery.
... I turned with respect to . . .
Primo Levi, The Periodic Table.
. . . Hermann Levi —
Peter Gay, Freud, Jews, and Other Germans.
Levi, . . .
Primo Levi, The Periodic Table.
. . . who was by no means free of vanity or unaware of his own position, . . .
Herbert Kupferberg, The Mendelssohns: Three Generations of Genius.
. . . that is, as . . .
Aldous Huxley, Cronte Yellow.
... a Jew in a gentile world, . . .
Peter Gay, Freud, Jews, and Other Germans.
. . . looked at me with an amused, vaguely ironic expression:
Primo Levi, The Periodic Table.
. . . ambivalent at its heart.
Peter Gay, Freud, Jews, and Other Germans.
He said:
Genesis.
My friend, you . . .
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust.
. . . could throw away . . .
Peter Gay, Freud: A Life for Our Time quoting Sigmund Freud, Letter to His Fiancee.
... all things —
George Gordon, Lord Byron, Excerpt from Don Juan.
. . . make common cause with . . .
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust.
. . . the devil . . .
Richard Wagner, Die Meistersinger von Nurnberg.
... as one would carry on a love affair.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust.
And all for what?
Wilkie Collins, The Evil Genius.
— and all for an old man;
Edwin Arlington Robinson, The Three Taverns.
. . . for a great moment . . .
Peter Gay, Freud: A Life for Our Time quoting Sigmund Freud, Letter to His Fiancee.
— one moment . . .
K.R. Eissler, Talent and Genius: The Fictitious Case of Tausk Contra Freud.
. . . with such a person . . .
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust.
... as Wagner
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Case of Wagner.
______________________________________
People wonder what I am aiming for. What is my goal? What will satisfy me? I am in search of a moment, one moment -- one great moment in history.
I identify with the following passage from a letter that Freud wrote to his fiancee Martha Bernays (which is quoted above). He probably wrote the letter while he was in medical school.
"I have often felt as though I had inherited all the defiance and all the passions with which our ancestors defended their Temple and could gladly sacrifice my life for one great moment in history. And at the same time I always felt so helpless and incapable of expressing these ardent passions even by a word or a poem."
Primo Levi, The Periodic Table.
Once there, . . .
Booker T. Washington, Up Front Slavery.
... I turned with respect to . . .
Primo Levi, The Periodic Table.
. . . Hermann Levi —
Peter Gay, Freud, Jews, and Other Germans.
Levi, . . .
Primo Levi, The Periodic Table.
. . . who was by no means free of vanity or unaware of his own position, . . .
Herbert Kupferberg, The Mendelssohns: Three Generations of Genius.
. . . that is, as . . .
Aldous Huxley, Cronte Yellow.
... a Jew in a gentile world, . . .
Peter Gay, Freud, Jews, and Other Germans.
. . . looked at me with an amused, vaguely ironic expression:
Primo Levi, The Periodic Table.
. . . ambivalent at its heart.
Peter Gay, Freud, Jews, and Other Germans.
He said:
Genesis.
My friend, you . . .
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust.
. . . could throw away . . .
Peter Gay, Freud: A Life for Our Time quoting Sigmund Freud, Letter to His Fiancee.
... all things —
George Gordon, Lord Byron, Excerpt from Don Juan.
. . . make common cause with . . .
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust.
. . . the devil . . .
Richard Wagner, Die Meistersinger von Nurnberg.
... as one would carry on a love affair.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust.
And all for what?
Wilkie Collins, The Evil Genius.
— and all for an old man;
Edwin Arlington Robinson, The Three Taverns.
. . . for a great moment . . .
Peter Gay, Freud: A Life for Our Time quoting Sigmund Freud, Letter to His Fiancee.
— one moment . . .
K.R. Eissler, Talent and Genius: The Fictitious Case of Tausk Contra Freud.
. . . with such a person . . .
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust.
... as Wagner
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Case of Wagner.
______________________________________
People wonder what I am aiming for. What is my goal? What will satisfy me? I am in search of a moment, one moment -- one great moment in history.
I identify with the following passage from a letter that Freud wrote to his fiancee Martha Bernays (which is quoted above). He probably wrote the letter while he was in medical school.
"I have often felt as though I had inherited all the defiance and all the passions with which our ancestors defended their Temple and could gladly sacrifice my life for one great moment in history. And at the same time I always felt so helpless and incapable of expressing these ardent passions even by a word or a poem."
The Personality Profile of a Person Who Worked Very Hard
This post is dedicated to David P. Callet, Esq.
Radium is a radioactive element in Group 2 (IIA) and Row 7 of the periodic table. The periodic table is a chart that shows how chemical elements are related to each other.
Radium was discovered by Marie Sklodowska Curie, a Polish chemist, and Pierre Curie, a French chemist, in 1898. Marie Curie obtained radium from pitchblende, a material that contains uranium, after noticing that unrefined pitchblende was more radioactive than the uranium that was separated from it. She reasoned that pitchblende must contain at least one other radioactive element. Curie needed to refine several tons of pitchblende -- a project that took four years -- in order to obtain tiny amounts of radium and polonium, another radioactive element discovered by Curie. One ton of uranium ore contains only about 0.14 grams of radium. There is about 1 gram of radium in 7 tons of pitchblende.
How many grams are in one ounce? There are approximately 28.35 gm (grams) of the metric system in one oz (ounce) of the British Imperial and US Standards for weights and measures. One gram is a mere fraction of an ounce.
Marie Curie was extremely strong-willed and she pursued her goals and desires with passionate dedication and determination. She was capable of total concentration and tremendous discipline, and she was very difficult to influence or sway once her mind was made up. When Marie Curie wanted something, she could be very one-sided and almost obsessed with it. She was very instinctive and did not always consciously know why she felt as strongly and deeply as she did.
She also tended to be secretive and unwilling to reveal her aims and intentions, and the intensity of her will and desire was not initially apparent to others. However, Curie was very forceful in a quiet and subtle way. Marie Curie often manipulated or forced her will upon other people, without being overtly aggressive. She was not interested in confrontation but she was a formidable foe if she encountered opposition or aggression. Marie was courageous and had a rather primitive, raw side as well.
She was known for her drive, energy, ambition, and competitive spirit. She based her successful career on her ability to take initiative, be a leader, and excel in physical strength and prowess. Marie Curie most definitely wanted to be a winner and would work hard to achieve that.
She was enterprising, ambitious and had a strong desire to succeed in a big way. Forever on the lookout for new opportunities and promising new ventures, Marie Curie was willing to take risks if she sensed a winner. No matter how much Marie accomplished, she never seemed to be completely satisfied. Marie Curie always felt that she could do more, and set her sights on another goal. Marie Curie felt frustrated in limited circumstances, and she would abandon secure and reasonably successful situations if they did not offer challenges and future growth potential. Curie liked to keep stretching her limits, to see how far she could go. Sometimes Curie overextended herself or promised more than she could actually achieve, due to an overly optimistic or confident assessment of her own capacities. Marie Curie relished healthy competition and felt that it spurred her on to even greater achievements.
Although enterprising and proactive, Marie Curie was also capable of ample self-discipline, patience and effort. She would swing from confidence and trust in the future to pessimism and doubt, when it came to achieving her aims in life.
She was very serious about attaining her goals and felt that keeping her nose to the grindstone was the only way to do it. It was by working hard, keeping up her efforts and focusing on a single objective that Marie Curie achieved her aims in life. Marie exercised great self-control, even self-denial, in order to accomplish what she desired. She met obstacles stoically and struggled patiently through difficult circumstances. Marie Curie felt that she had to rely on herself alone and that she had to shoulder all of the responsibility. She could be a harsh disciplinarian, expecting far too much of herself and others. Marie often held herself back, doubting her own power and ability. She felt that she met great resistance whenever she tried to assert herself or take initiative, which was very frustrating for her. However, Marie Curie had the power to endure and a dogged determination to overcome all obstacles.
Marie had many artistic talents as well as the ability and creative energy to express them. She leaned more toward practical arts such as utility objects made artistically or working with metal. Marie Curie was also quite passionate and enjoyed physical activity.
She found it difficult to communicate with others and had a tendency to quarrel. It was hard for Marie Curie to express herself and her ideas and opinions were often challenged by others. Because of frequent disagreements, Marie likely felt that her relationships were incompatible.
Marie Curie felt she had a destiny which involved leadership or distinguishing herself in some line of endeavor. Marie possessed an innate sense of greatness or importance, and a strong drive to achieve recognition for her talent. Marie Curie avoided excessive egotism and arrogant pride, for these could limit her opportunities.
Curie gained her objectives and ambitions in life through her personal charm, attractiveness, ability to please others visually and/or emotionally. A career in the arts or entertainment world was possible for Marie Curie. Anything involving sales or promotion, particularly of beautiful or luxurious items, was an area she could succeed in. Vanity or indiscretions in relationships could lead Marie Curie to her downfall.
Her role in life was apt to be one of great responsibility and Marie Curie took her tasks very seriously. Certain heaviness weighed on her because of this. She may have been unusually ambitious or mature at a tender age. Marie Curie advanced and attained her aspirations through dedication and perseverance, rather than fortune.
Deep, compelling drives which Marie Curie did not entirely understand were apt to be the source of her rather extraordinary ambitions. She may have found that a drive for dominance, power, and control arose out of the rather problematic and intense relationships Marie had with one or both of her parents. Marie Curie's willingness to delve deeply into her own fears and inner life, clearing away much of the conditioning of her earliest years, allowed her to discover tremendous inner resources which could be used to fuel her rise in the world.
Her career involved protecting, caring, and nurturing in some aspect. Home, family relationships, cherishing the past, continuing a tradition were also featured. Marie Curie was apt to be quite popular through her profession or business.
Marie Curie had a beautiful soul, was aesthetically inclined and had a love of fine arts. She may have wanted to be involved in a career where art, acting, or beauty were paramount.
Marie Curie seemed to lack confidence in herself and worried about being compromised or exposed. She may have felt that she was unable to defend herself and tended to withdraw from close relationships. It was more important to Marie to do the right thing than to be popular.
Radium is a radioactive element in Group 2 (IIA) and Row 7 of the periodic table. The periodic table is a chart that shows how chemical elements are related to each other.
Radium was discovered by Marie Sklodowska Curie, a Polish chemist, and Pierre Curie, a French chemist, in 1898. Marie Curie obtained radium from pitchblende, a material that contains uranium, after noticing that unrefined pitchblende was more radioactive than the uranium that was separated from it. She reasoned that pitchblende must contain at least one other radioactive element. Curie needed to refine several tons of pitchblende -- a project that took four years -- in order to obtain tiny amounts of radium and polonium, another radioactive element discovered by Curie. One ton of uranium ore contains only about 0.14 grams of radium. There is about 1 gram of radium in 7 tons of pitchblende.
How many grams are in one ounce? There are approximately 28.35 gm (grams) of the metric system in one oz (ounce) of the British Imperial and US Standards for weights and measures. One gram is a mere fraction of an ounce.
Marie Curie was extremely strong-willed and she pursued her goals and desires with passionate dedication and determination. She was capable of total concentration and tremendous discipline, and she was very difficult to influence or sway once her mind was made up. When Marie Curie wanted something, she could be very one-sided and almost obsessed with it. She was very instinctive and did not always consciously know why she felt as strongly and deeply as she did.
She also tended to be secretive and unwilling to reveal her aims and intentions, and the intensity of her will and desire was not initially apparent to others. However, Curie was very forceful in a quiet and subtle way. Marie Curie often manipulated or forced her will upon other people, without being overtly aggressive. She was not interested in confrontation but she was a formidable foe if she encountered opposition or aggression. Marie was courageous and had a rather primitive, raw side as well.
She was known for her drive, energy, ambition, and competitive spirit. She based her successful career on her ability to take initiative, be a leader, and excel in physical strength and prowess. Marie Curie most definitely wanted to be a winner and would work hard to achieve that.
She was enterprising, ambitious and had a strong desire to succeed in a big way. Forever on the lookout for new opportunities and promising new ventures, Marie Curie was willing to take risks if she sensed a winner. No matter how much Marie accomplished, she never seemed to be completely satisfied. Marie Curie always felt that she could do more, and set her sights on another goal. Marie Curie felt frustrated in limited circumstances, and she would abandon secure and reasonably successful situations if they did not offer challenges and future growth potential. Curie liked to keep stretching her limits, to see how far she could go. Sometimes Curie overextended herself or promised more than she could actually achieve, due to an overly optimistic or confident assessment of her own capacities. Marie Curie relished healthy competition and felt that it spurred her on to even greater achievements.
Although enterprising and proactive, Marie Curie was also capable of ample self-discipline, patience and effort. She would swing from confidence and trust in the future to pessimism and doubt, when it came to achieving her aims in life.
She was very serious about attaining her goals and felt that keeping her nose to the grindstone was the only way to do it. It was by working hard, keeping up her efforts and focusing on a single objective that Marie Curie achieved her aims in life. Marie exercised great self-control, even self-denial, in order to accomplish what she desired. She met obstacles stoically and struggled patiently through difficult circumstances. Marie Curie felt that she had to rely on herself alone and that she had to shoulder all of the responsibility. She could be a harsh disciplinarian, expecting far too much of herself and others. Marie often held herself back, doubting her own power and ability. She felt that she met great resistance whenever she tried to assert herself or take initiative, which was very frustrating for her. However, Marie Curie had the power to endure and a dogged determination to overcome all obstacles.
Marie had many artistic talents as well as the ability and creative energy to express them. She leaned more toward practical arts such as utility objects made artistically or working with metal. Marie Curie was also quite passionate and enjoyed physical activity.
She found it difficult to communicate with others and had a tendency to quarrel. It was hard for Marie Curie to express herself and her ideas and opinions were often challenged by others. Because of frequent disagreements, Marie likely felt that her relationships were incompatible.
Marie Curie felt she had a destiny which involved leadership or distinguishing herself in some line of endeavor. Marie possessed an innate sense of greatness or importance, and a strong drive to achieve recognition for her talent. Marie Curie avoided excessive egotism and arrogant pride, for these could limit her opportunities.
Curie gained her objectives and ambitions in life through her personal charm, attractiveness, ability to please others visually and/or emotionally. A career in the arts or entertainment world was possible for Marie Curie. Anything involving sales or promotion, particularly of beautiful or luxurious items, was an area she could succeed in. Vanity or indiscretions in relationships could lead Marie Curie to her downfall.
Her role in life was apt to be one of great responsibility and Marie Curie took her tasks very seriously. Certain heaviness weighed on her because of this. She may have been unusually ambitious or mature at a tender age. Marie Curie advanced and attained her aspirations through dedication and perseverance, rather than fortune.
Deep, compelling drives which Marie Curie did not entirely understand were apt to be the source of her rather extraordinary ambitions. She may have found that a drive for dominance, power, and control arose out of the rather problematic and intense relationships Marie had with one or both of her parents. Marie Curie's willingness to delve deeply into her own fears and inner life, clearing away much of the conditioning of her earliest years, allowed her to discover tremendous inner resources which could be used to fuel her rise in the world.
Her career involved protecting, caring, and nurturing in some aspect. Home, family relationships, cherishing the past, continuing a tradition were also featured. Marie Curie was apt to be quite popular through her profession or business.
Marie Curie had a beautiful soul, was aesthetically inclined and had a love of fine arts. She may have wanted to be involved in a career where art, acting, or beauty were paramount.
Marie Curie seemed to lack confidence in herself and worried about being compromised or exposed. She may have felt that she was unable to defend herself and tended to withdraw from close relationships. It was more important to Marie to do the right thing than to be popular.
Friday, June 24, 2011
Social Security Initial Claim: Lack of Deception
June 15, 1993
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
#136
Washington, DC 20008
Paul G. Yessler, MD
2501 Calvert Street, NW
Suite 101
Washington, DC 20008
RE: Social Security Disability Psychiatric Evaluation xxx-xx-xxxx
Dear Dr. Yessler:
Enclosed is a copy of five pages of handwritten notes that I prepared in late October 1991 under the influence of my belief that the then manager of my apartment building, Ms. Elayne Wranik, inspected the apartment daily and reported her findings back to management of my former employer, Akin Gump. I left the notes in a prominent place in my apartment to be reviewed by Ms. Wranik in the period immediately prior to my job termination, on October 29, 1991.
Both the content of the writing and my motive in writing the document may evidence a grave personality disturbance not inconsistent with a diagnosis DSM-III 295.32 (Schizophrenia, stable paranoid type, chronic), which renders me unemployable. See, Spitzer, R.L., et al. DSM-III-R Case Book, at 28-30 (American Psychiatric Press: 1989) (discussing a patient suffering from a systematized delusion of a conspiracy of harassment).
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
#136
Washington, DC 20008
Paul G. Yessler, MD
2501 Calvert Street, NW
Suite 101
Washington, DC 20008
RE: Social Security Disability Psychiatric Evaluation xxx-xx-xxxx
Dear Dr. Yessler:
Enclosed is a copy of five pages of handwritten notes that I prepared in late October 1991 under the influence of my belief that the then manager of my apartment building, Ms. Elayne Wranik, inspected the apartment daily and reported her findings back to management of my former employer, Akin Gump. I left the notes in a prominent place in my apartment to be reviewed by Ms. Wranik in the period immediately prior to my job termination, on October 29, 1991.
Both the content of the writing and my motive in writing the document may evidence a grave personality disturbance not inconsistent with a diagnosis DSM-III 295.32 (Schizophrenia, stable paranoid type, chronic), which renders me unemployable. See, Spitzer, R.L., et al. DSM-III-R Case Book, at 28-30 (American Psychiatric Press: 1989) (discussing a patient suffering from a systematized delusion of a conspiracy of harassment).
Sincerely,
Gary Freedman
Akin Gump Surveillance: Message for Elaine Wranik
During my employment at the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld I formed the belief that the manager of my apartment building entered my apartment surreptitiously every morning, looked around, and reported back to Akin Gump managers what she saw. I used to leave messages for Elaine Wranik to read, many of which were humorous. The messages were psychologically revealing, I suppose. I found Akin Gump's surveillance to be ridiculous and humorous. My paranoia was not associated with anger and a potential for violence; any assessing psychiatrist would have seen that.
The following is a handwritten message I left some time during the summer of 1991. Public Television was rebroadcasting the drama series I, Claudius. The following writing is a parody of a scene from I, Claudius in which the Emperor Augustus interrogates Senators accused of having had sex with his daughter, Julia.
I, CLAUDIUS REVISITED
Founding partner of major law firm interrogating group of individuals accused of having harassed a legal assistant.
"Have you harassed my legal assistant?"
--"Yes, Mal."
"Have you harassed my legal assistant?"
--"Yes, Mal."
"And you, have you harassed my legal assistant?"
--"Only once, Mal."
--"Oh, only once."
"And you, have you harassed my legal assistant?"
--"Not harassed, Mal."
--"Oh, not harassed. Perhaps you just teased him, standing up in a xerox room or in the lobby."
The founding partner steps aside, enraged. He yells at the top of his voice--
"Is there anyone here who has not harassed my legal assistant?"
The following is a handwritten message I left some time during the summer of 1991. Public Television was rebroadcasting the drama series I, Claudius. The following writing is a parody of a scene from I, Claudius in which the Emperor Augustus interrogates Senators accused of having had sex with his daughter, Julia.
I, CLAUDIUS REVISITED
Founding partner of major law firm interrogating group of individuals accused of having harassed a legal assistant.
"Have you harassed my legal assistant?"
--"Yes, Mal."
"Have you harassed my legal assistant?"
--"Yes, Mal."
"And you, have you harassed my legal assistant?"
--"Only once, Mal."
--"Oh, only once."
"And you, have you harassed my legal assistant?"
--"Not harassed, Mal."
--"Oh, not harassed. Perhaps you just teased him, standing up in a xerox room or in the lobby."
The founding partner steps aside, enraged. He yells at the top of his voice--
"Is there anyone here who has not harassed my legal assistant?"
Eleanor Holmes Norton -- Letter of February 24, 1994
The following letter was apparently written in connection with Representative Norton's assistance with my Social Security Disability claim:
Mr. Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue NW #136
Washington, DC 20008
Dear Mr. Freedman:
Thank you for your kind letter of February 18, 1994. I am glad I could be of help.
Please do not hesitate to contact me whenever you feel I may be of assistance to you in a matter within my federal jurisdiction
Sincerely,
Eleanor Holmes Norton
EHN:kh
Mr. Gary Freedman
3801 Connecticut Avenue NW #136
Washington, DC 20008
Dear Mr. Freedman:
Thank you for your kind letter of February 18, 1994. I am glad I could be of help.
Please do not hesitate to contact me whenever you feel I may be of assistance to you in a matter within my federal jurisdiction
Sincerely,
Eleanor Holmes Norton
EHN:kh
Apparently Someone who Worked at the Franklin Institute
Havertown, Pennsylvania, United States Comcast Cable (76.98.21.130) [Label IP Address] www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #1
24 Jun01:47:27 AM
www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #1
24 Jun01:52:12 AM
www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #1
24 Jun01:52:51 AM
24 Jun01:55:57 AM
www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #1
24 Jun01:56:34 AM
www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #1
24 Jun01:57:08 AM
www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #1
24 Jun01:57:51 AM
www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #3
24 Jun01:58:14 AM
www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #1
24 Jun01:59:22 AM
www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #1
24 Jun01:59:59 AM
www.google.com — ip address 76.98.21.130 #1
24 Jun02:02:19 AM
www.google.com — gary freedman franklin institute #1
24 Jun02:05:25 AM
24 Jun02:06:51 AM
www.google.com — gary freedman franklin institute #1
24 Jun02:08:38 AM
www.google.com — gary freedman franklin institute #2
24 Jun02:09:04 AM
www.google.com — gary freedman franklin institute #3
24 Jun02:09:28 AM
www.google.com — gary freedman franklin institute #4
24 Jun02:11:10 AM
www.google.com — gary freedman franklin institute #1
24 Jun02:17:45 AM
24 Jun02:18:03 AM
www.google.com — gary freedman franklin institute #1
24 Jun02:18:19 AM
www.google.com — gary freedman franklin institute #1
24 Jun02:18:51 AM
www.google.com — gary freedman franklin institute #2
24 Jun02:19:29 AM
www.google.com — gary freedman franklin institute #3
24 Jun02:19:51 AM
www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #1
24 Jun02:21:00 AM
24 Jun02:22:11 AM
www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #1
24 Jun02:22:39 AM
www.google.com — bernie epstein franklin institute #2
24 Jun02:23:55 AM
dailstrug.blogspot.com/2010/05/my-apologies-to-bernie-epstein.html
| 24 Jun | 02:23:55 AM | |
| www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #1 | ||
| 24 Jun | 12:06:23 PM | |
| www.google.com — alec peters franklin institute #2 | ||
| 24 Jun | 12:06:36 PM |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
