March 22, 2014
3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20008
The Honorable Richard W. Roberts
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20077-0114
RE: Jury Duty -- Participant # 101476514 Juror # 01-1442
Dear Judge Roberts:
U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. knows about the issue of potential juror fraud in my case.
Gary Freedman, Esq.
Pennsylvania Attorney ID 41032
cc: Clerks Office--U.S. District Court
Mark F. Giuliano, Assistant Director, FBI
August 4, 1994
3801 Connecticut Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20008
Dennis M. Race, Esq.
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld
1333 New Hampshire Ave., NW
Dear Mr. Race:
As a resident of the District of Columbia and a citizen of the United
States, I may be summoned at any time to serve on a jury of the United
States District Court for the District of Columbia or the Superior Court
of the District of Columbia ("Courts").
Sworn statements filed by the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer
& Feld in D.C. Department of Human Rights and Minority Business
Development Investigation docket no. 92-087-P(CN) concerning my mental
health necessarily relate to my competence and fitness to serve as a
juror and may, indeed, disqualify me from jury duty.
You are advised that should I be summoned for jury duty by either of the
Courts, the subsequent failure by attorney managers of the law firm of
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld affirmatively to disavow to the
Courts any prior misrepresentations said managers may have made
regarding my mental health, and which failure by said managers causes
either of the Courts to disqualify me from jury duty by reason of mental
impairment, may constitute an unlawful act of interference by said
attorney managers in the jury selection process of the Courts in
violation of the laws of the United States and the District of Columbia.
This communication is offered as a courtesy to Akin, Gump, Strauss,
Hauer & Feld, and is intended respectfully to advise that regardless
of the bona fides of sworn statements filed by the firm with the D.C.
Department of Human Rights, I am nonetheless in possession of
documentary evidence that raises serious questions about the veracity of
said sworn statements and may, ultimately, raise a fraud issue under
either 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1865(b)(4) or D.C. Code Sec. 11-1906(b)(2)(A)
should I be summoned for jury duty.
cc: U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia [Eric H. Holder, Jr.]
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Jury Division, U.S. District Court for D.C.
Juror Office, D.C. Superior Court
Charles Reischel, Deputy D.C. Corporation Counsel