Letter to D.C. Attorney General

                                                                       December 18, 2015
                                                                       3801 Connecticut Avenue, NW
                                                                       Apt. 136
                                                                       Washington, DC  20008

The Honorable Karl A. Racine
Office of the Attorney General
Government of the District of Columbia
Judiciary Square
441 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Phone: (202) 727-3400
Fax: (202) 347-8922

RE:  Admission of Possible Felony Fraud

Dear Mr. Racine:

This will advise the D.C. Office of Attorney General that on the afternoon of December 14, 2015 I had a psychiatric consultation with Alice E. Stone, M.D., a psychiatry resident affiliated with St. Elizabeths Hospital working under the supervision of Earl Baughman, M.D.   There is evidence that said psychiatric consultation, whose cost is billed to DC Medicaid and Medicare, was medically questionable or fraudulent. 

There is ample and persuasive evidence that I do not suffer from severe (psychotic) mental illness, diagnosed as paranoid schizophrenia by Dimitrios Georgopoulos, M.D. (1996) and Albert H. Taub, M.D. (1999) (St. Elizabeths Hospital) and that the D.C. Department of Behavioral Health is therefore billing D.C. Medicaid and Medicare for the treatment of nonexistent mental illness.  But see Freedman v. D.C. Dept. Human Rights, D.C.C.A. no. 96-CV-961 (Sept. 1, 1998) (my employer, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, had genuine and credible reasons to determine that I was unemployable because I suffered from a psychiatric “disorder” that rendered me a direct threat in the workplace based on a (medically-worthless) psychiatric opinion offered by a consulting psychiatrist).

My psychiatric treatment provided by the D.C. Department of Behavioral Health for apparently non-existent severe mental illness raises a possibility that I am fraudulently using said psychiatric services to bolster a fraudulent Social Security disability claim, which would constitute a felony.  But see Freedman v. D.C. Dept. Human Rights (I became disabled effective October 29, 1991 based on a (medically-worthless) psychiatric opinion solicited by my former employer).

Comprehensive psychological testing performed by the George Washington University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science in 1994 and 1996 disclosed that I do not suffer from any diagnosable mental illness (see attached).  But see Freedman v. D.C. Dept. Human Rights, D.C.C.A. no. 96-CV-961 (Sept. 1, 1998) (my employer, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld had genuine and credible reasons to determine that I was unemployable because I suffered from a psychiatric “disorder” that rendered me a direct threat in the workplace based on a (medically-worthless) psychiatric opinion offered by a consulting psychiatrist).

I urge the D.C. Attorney General to institute a fraud investigation into this matter and/or make a criminal referral of this matter to the FBI.

Sincerely,

 Gary Freedman

cc: Tanya A. Royster, M.D.; The Honorable Leslie R. Caldwell