Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Literary Symbolism -- and Mobbing in the Workplace

http://www.ehow.com/how_2095782_understand-symbolism-literature.html

How to Understand Symbolism in Literature

Whether you are taking a high school or college English literature course, symbolism will be important for you to recognize to fully understand a literature selection. If you've never had to evaluate a work critically, this may seem like a scary experience. Fear not, you can do it. Read on to learn how to understand symbolism in literature.

Step 1 -- Grasp the meaning of "symbol." Just as the American bald eagle is often thought of as the symbol of the United States, symbols used in literature are objects used to represent other things or ideas. For example, in Hawthorne's "The Scarlet Letter," the "A" that Hester Prynne was forced to wear represented not only that she was an adulteress, but also the first letter of the name of her illegitimate child's father, the Reverend Arthur Dimmesdale.

Step 2 -- Recognize the signs. There are several ways to recognize symbolism in literature. One is the frequency an object or character is mentioned in a piece of literature--if it is mentioned often, it is probably important. Another way to find a symbol is to look at how much detail is used in describing an object. These two methods give clues that the writer wants you to infer something about a particular object.

Step 3 -- Familiarize yourself with the author's work and style. A symbol in a piece of literature often represents an important issue of the time in which the author lived, or has personal significance to the writer. Edgar Allan Poe, for example, is well-known for the tragedy he suffered during his lifetime. His stories and poetry often included dark imagery and death which were undoubtedly symbolic of the events in his life.

Step 4 -- Trust your feelings. If an image or object described by the author makes you react in a certain way, you are probably on to something, never discredit your own feelings just because you're a novice. It is very likely that the author planted the image in the work in a particular way to alert the reader that a symbol is important.

Step 5 -- Look to others. There's no shame in reading critical essays about a literary work to gain a better understanding of it, or in discussing a piece of literature.

Mobbing In The Workplace

It has been my experience of workplace mobbing that there is a relationship between this subtle form of job harassment -- which tends to rely on hidden messages in the communicators' speech -- and literary symbolism. See, for example, Keyton, J. and Menzie, K. "Sexually Harassing Messages: Decoding Workplace Conversation." Communication Studies, March 1, 2007; Gruber, J.E. "A Typology of Personal and Environmental Sexual Harassment: Research and Policy Implications for the 1990's" (1992).

Step 1 -- Grasp the meaning of "symbol." Just as the American bald eagle is often thought of as the symbol of the United States, symbols used in mobbing are ideas used to represent other things. For example, in anti-semitic harassment the view of Jews as "liars" may be prominent. If you Google the phrase "Jews are liars," you will get 567,000 hits; substituting any other ethnic or religious group for "Jews" will yield far fewer hits. Google the phrase "Italians are liars," for example, and you will get 6,020 hits. We can expect that plays on the word "liar" will be prominent in anti-semitic workplace mobbing. Thus, an employee may sit at her desk and say, "Liar, liar, pants on fire;" then later, use a Yiddish phrase ("Oy, veh," for example) -- then talk about her July telephone bill, symbolizing the phrase "Jew lie."

Step 2 -- Recognize the signs. There are several ways to recognize mobbing in the workplace. One is the frequency an idea or individual is mentioned in workplace conversations -- if an individual or idea is mentioned often, it is probably important. Another way to find a symbol in workplace mobbing is to look at how much detail is used in describing an idea. These two methods give clues that the harasser wants you to infer something about a particular idea.

Step 3 -- Familiarize yourself with the harassers' conversational style. A symbol in workplace mobbing often has personal significance to the victim of mobbing. Mobbers' constant references to ideas symbolically related to the victim's personal life -- consultations the victim may have had with his psychiatrist, for example -- may indicate that the company's management has been in communication with the victim's psychiatrist and has divulged confidential mental health information relating to the victim to other employees.

Step 4 -- Trust your feelings. If an image or idea described by coworkers makes you react in a certain way, you are probably on to something; never discredit your own feelings just because you're making inferences that could be dismissed as paranoid. In workplace mobbing situations, it is very likely that the mobbers planted the image in the conversation in a particular way to alert the victim that he is the symbolic referent of the communication.

Step 5 -- Look to the experiences of others in the same work environment. If an African-American coworker was terminated by the employer in suspicious circumstances, it is all the more likely that you are correct to suspect that you are a victim of job harassment in that same environment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cEfc-CRkUk&feature=channel

3 comments:

  1. I suppose it makes sense that somebody who reads a lot of classic literature would be good at picking up the symbolic meanings of people's conversations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Curriculum Vitae

    Joann Keyton, Ph.D.
    Professor
    North Carolina State University, Dept. of Communication

    Office 919-513-7402
    Mail: 201 Winston Hall
    Campus Box 8104
    Personal 919-208-3092
    Office: Caldwell Hall M6
    Email: jkeyton@ncsu.edu

    Ph.D., Communication/Business Administration
    The Ohio State University, 1987

    M.A., Communication,
    The Ohio State University 1985

    B.A., Summa cum laude Organizational Communication/Theatrical Dance Western Michigan University, 1983

    ReplyDelete
  3. The following is a brief scene from the British television comedy series "The Office." My reading of the scene is that the characters Tim and Dawn are tormenting the character Gareth with homosexual double-entendres. Query: Does Gareth's failure to appreciate the fact that he is being harassed a sign that Gareth is not paranoid or is it a sign that he is dim-witted? Is my belief that I was being harassed at Akin Gump a sign that I was paranoid or is it a sign that I am not dim-witted?

    Tim: I was wondering if a military man like you, um -- a soldier -- could -- could you give a man a lethal blow?

    Gareth: If I was forced to. I could. If it was absolutely necessary. If he was attacking me.

    Tim: If he was coming really hard.

    Gareth: Yeah, if my life was in danger, yeah.

    Dawn: And do you always imagine doing it face to face with a bloke or could you take a man from behind?

    Gareth: Either way is easy.

    Dawn: Either way. And so you could do a man from behind?

    Gareth: Yeah . . .

    Tim: So . . . you've dug your foxhole, and you've pitched your tent, right? They've discovered your camp, and you're lying there, and they've caught you with your trousers down, and they've all entered your hole without you knowing.

    Gareth: No, 'cause I'd be ready for them.

    Tim: You'd just be lying there waiting for it?

    Gareth: Yeah. Well, no. What's more likely is that I wouldn't be there if I knew they knew where I was. I'd be hiding, watching the hole, using it as a trap.

    Tim: So, you'd be using your hole as bait?

    Gareth: Yeah.

    ReplyDelete